Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Opinion

News Opinion

Allowing voters to veto transportation projects won't change anything

Former Gov. Parris N. Glendening's proposal to let voters decide whether to build transportation projects ignores the long history of disconnect between the state's plans and outcomes, which cannot be resolved by a simple yes or no by voters ("Voters will support transportation projects," April 22).

This goes back at least as far as the 1960s, when voters rejected a second parallel span for the Bay Bridge — and the state built it anyway.

In the 1990s, even Gov. William Donald Schaefer got conned by his own Department of Transportation's promises regarding light rail. Massive hidden cost overruns led to a disastrous single track scheme, a costly disruptive reconstruction, and low ridership from which the entire system, especially Howard Street, has never recovered. Mr. Schaefer ultimately had to fire Metropolitan Transit Authority administrator Ron Hartman.

In 2002, voters implicitly vetoed Mr. Glendening's attempt to kill the InterCounty Connector (ICC) when they elected Gov.Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.to replace him. But the bureaucrats ultimately fooled everyone when massive toll increases throughout the state became necessary to pay for it. Then they sold us a billion dollar "express toll" lane plan for I-95, which will not attract sufficient users to cover its costs for decades, if ever.

Now Mr. Glendening wants a 50/50 allocation to transit expansions and road repair projects, even though history shows that most of the money ultimately goes to sprawl-feeding highway expansions (like the ICC) and burgeoning transit operating deficits by the chronically underperforming MTA.

The fundamental problem with putting the ultimate decision about transportation projects in the hands of voters is that the plans themselves will still be formulated by insiders and their cronies, and even if voters say "nay," those interests will simply come up with another "take it or leave it" scheme.

That's not voter empowerment or rational planning; it's just a recipe for more backroom dealing and buck-passing.

That's why the only rational response is to do what the General Assembly is already doing: Starve the transportation beast by refusing to impose increased gas taxes on Maryland's fed-up citizens.

Gerald Neily, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Expanding the transportation conversation

    Transportation is a hot button issue in Baltimore City these days. In fact, it's red hot. At a recent community meeting, residents unloaded on the Maryland Department of Transportation over a proposed plan to restrict parking on the south side of Aliceanna Street during rush hour.

  • Preventing the next death in police custody
    Preventing the next death in police custody

    Growing up in the Cherry Hill neighborhood of Baltimore, there was rarely a week that went by when my parents, Bill and Madeline Murphy, weren't strategizing on how to end racial injustice in my hometown. Police harassment was a frequent complaint of our Cherry Hill friends and neighbors. The current...

  • Martin O'Malley's modern-day know-nothingness
    Martin O'Malley's modern-day know-nothingness

    Former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley is thinking about running for president on the Democratic ticket by appealing to Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren's populist fans. Ms. Warren is a very bright former Harvard law professor. So it is interesting that Mr. O'Malley thinks the best way to reach...

  • No 'lynch mobs' here
    No 'lynch mobs' here

    Given the circumstances of Freddie Gray's death, it's hardly a surprise that many in this city are justifiably concerned about the behavior of the Baltimore Police Department and the six officers who had contact with the 25-year-old when he was arrested and placed in custody and who have since...

  • The charitable view in partisan politics
    The charitable view in partisan politics

    As the 2016 presidential campaign season takes off, we are reminded that politics in the United States is trapped in a cycle of dysfunctional partisanship. And it's our fault. But — before we are caught up in the swirl of television ads, debates and robocalls — there is something we can do about...

  • Mandate gifted programs
    Mandate gifted programs

    After U.S. Sen. Barbara Mikulski announced plans to retire in 2016, advocates for high-performing students sang her praises for her steadfast support of federal initiatives to boost programming for academically gifted, low-income learners, and with it, the likelihood that they will fulfill their...

Comments
Loading

37°