Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
News Opinion

Allowing voters to veto transportation projects won't change anything

Former Gov. Parris N. Glendening's proposal to let voters decide whether to build transportation projects ignores the long history of disconnect between the state's plans and outcomes, which cannot be resolved by a simple yes or no by voters ("Voters will support transportation projects," April 22).

This goes back at least as far as the 1960s, when voters rejected a second parallel span for the Bay Bridge — and the state built it anyway.

In the 1990s, even Gov. William Donald Schaefer got conned by his own Department of Transportation's promises regarding light rail. Massive hidden cost overruns led to a disastrous single track scheme, a costly disruptive reconstruction, and low ridership from which the entire system, especially Howard Street, has never recovered. Mr. Schaefer ultimately had to fire Metropolitan Transit Authority administrator Ron Hartman.

In 2002, voters implicitly vetoed Mr. Glendening's attempt to kill the InterCounty Connector (ICC) when they elected Gov.Robert L. Ehrlich replace him. But the bureaucrats ultimately fooled everyone when massive toll increases throughout the state became necessary to pay for it. Then they sold us a billion dollar "express toll" lane plan for I-95, which will not attract sufficient users to cover its costs for decades, if ever.

Now Mr. Glendening wants a 50/50 allocation to transit expansions and road repair projects, even though history shows that most of the money ultimately goes to sprawl-feeding highway expansions (like the ICC) and burgeoning transit operating deficits by the chronically underperforming MTA.

The fundamental problem with putting the ultimate decision about transportation projects in the hands of voters is that the plans themselves will still be formulated by insiders and their cronies, and even if voters say "nay," those interests will simply come up with another "take it or leave it" scheme.

That's not voter empowerment or rational planning; it's just a recipe for more backroom dealing and buck-passing.

That's why the only rational response is to do what the General Assembly is already doing: Starve the transportation beast by refusing to impose increased gas taxes on Maryland's fed-up citizens.

Gerald Neily, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Lieberman: Obama must reveal side deals on Iran nuclear program

    Lieberman: Obama must reveal side deals on Iran nuclear program

    Members of Congress must know more about secret side arrangements between the International Atomic Energy Agency and Iran before they vote on the proposed nuclear agreement with Tehran. Why won't the Obama administration reveal the topics that the various side deals touch upon?

  • The poster state for climate change

    The poster state for climate change

    With all due respect to Ohio Republicans and their collective affection for the late William McKinley, whose second term in the White House was cut short 114 years ago by an anarchist's bullets, the most important event of President Barack Obama's trip to Alaska was not the return of Mount Denali...

  • Freddie Gray case: Order in the court

    Freddie Gray case: Order in the court

    For the first several days after Freddie Gray's death in April, thousands of Baltimoreans peacefully took to the streets to protest his treatment by police and to demand broader changes in neighborhoods like the one where he lived. Whatever it was that led to the rioting that followed — outside...

  • Trump the Barbarian

    Trump the Barbarian

    Whether he is fielding questions from the press or talking to voters, Donald Trump is consistently comfortable in his own florid skin and flamboyant hair. To the amazement of veteran journalists, political operatives and the other Republican candidates, that is making him a very formidable contender...

  • The Mandel legacy

    The Mandel legacy

    Marvin Mandel passed away on Sunday at the age of 95, but his legacy lives on, not only in his successes as governor but for his willingness to manipulate the legislative process to benefit his circles of friends who were, in turn, quite generous to him. Marylanders should not forget either side...

  • O'Malley's sweetheart deal

    O'Malley's sweetheart deal

    When Martin O'Malley left the governor's mansion in January, he and his wife were allowed to buy for $9,638 dozens of pieces of furniture the taxpayers had spent $62,000 to purchase, most of it eight years earlier, on the grounds that it was "junk" that would otherwise have been thrown away. Those...