Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion

Baltimore should refund questionable speed camera tickets

In the capitalist-communist People's Republic of China, people encounter problems returning products that stink. In our capitalist-democracy of the United States of America, a refund on stinky products is an honored business practice. An overt sense of fairness is the glue of invisible integrity that hinges an economy based on spending.

If you buy it and it stinks, you return it and get your money back. No questions asked.

In the U.S. economy, one cannot sell snake oil and call it orange juice. One cannot legally sell faulty manufactured electronics, medicines, cars, computers, airplanes, milk or thousands of other faulty products and get away with it. Frankly, people will not buy products that stink. Heck, even the IRS will return your money, if, oops!, they make a stinky mistake. A bank will return your money if, oops!, they make an error and you catch it.

In America the accepted business practice is that if a product stinks, return it and get your money back. In the Republic of Baltimore, with faulty speed camera tickets, admittedly issued incorrectly, people are expected to pay. Something smells.

If I had the ear (or nose) of the civic leaders of this great republic, I would suggest a win-win for everyone: Speed Camera Ticket Amnesty. Be fair to the citizens of the Republic of Baltimore. Give the citizens some relief from blatant unfairness contracted into that ungodly bounty-for-tickets contract/scheme. Citizens should demand fair-play on this matter, and civic leaders should lead with good government to help the citizens of our great city.

Bill Curtis, Baltimore

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Cameras and corruption
      Cameras and corruption

      I have followed The Sun's investigation of Baltimore's speed and red light cameras from the beginning and believe a desire for a back door tax is what is driving Baltimore's concern and not protecting the poor innocent school children they claim when defending the constitutionality of such laws...

    • Get a move on: Local speed limits are too low [Letter]
      Get a move on: Local speed limits are too low [Letter]

      Congratulations to Howard County for trying to figure out sensible speed limits ("Are Howard County's speed limits too low?" Aug. 5).

    • Smaller is better
      Smaller is better

      A Baltimore City Council investigative committee looking into the city's problem-plagued speed- and red light-camera program has discovered what should have been obvious all along: That the now suspended system was far too big to be managed efficiently, that it was set up too quickly by the...

    • The surreal comedy of Baltimore's speed cameras [Letter]
      The surreal comedy of Baltimore's speed cameras [Letter]

      I really wish I was in the speed camera consulting business in Baltimore right now, as I could make a killing ("City takes step toward new speed camera program Feb. 5). Why is this whole speed camera debacle turning into such a surreal comedy? One answer might be that there is such a total...

    • City speed camera saga gets stranger by the day [Letter]
      City speed camera saga gets stranger by the day [Letter]

      A national firm is not qualified to complete a simple engineering study of the city's speed cameras ("Mayor says audit firm was 'not sufficiently qualified,'" Jan. 29).

    • Failure all around
      Failure all around
    • Comedy Central at City Hall [Letter]
      Comedy Central at City Hall [Letter]

      Baltimore's mayor hides a report highly critical of the city's red-light and speed camera program, claiming that the vendor, whom she hired yet again, was somehow incompetent ("Mayor says audit firm was 'not sufficiently qualified,'" Jan. 29).

    • Why rehire the unqualified? [Letter]
      Why rehire the unqualified? [Letter]

      Regarding the URS Corp.'s red light and speed camera audit and their subsequent rehiring, "somebody's got some 'splaining to do" ("Mayor says audit firm was 'not sufficiently qualified,'" Jan. 29).

    Comments
    Loading