Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99


News Opinion

Preserving Social Security will require sacrifice

While I agree with some of Max Richtman's commentary on Social Security ("Protect senior programs," Feb. 17), many of his observations are misleading.

Certainly, most any poll will show that people do not want any benefit cuts, and I would bet that most would want benefits to increase. That's just human nature. As an old saying goes, "When you rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have Paul's vote."

However, his use of such terms and phrases as "earned benefits" and "economic reason" do not pass muster when certain facts are considered. For example, for the first 13 years that Social Security taxes were collected — that is, 1937 through 1949 — the maximum amount collected from any worker was $30 per year or 1 percent of the first $3,000 of wages. Certainly, the dollar was worth much more then (in fact, the Consumer Price Index has gone up approximately by a factor of 15), but that translates to a maximum of $450 in today's dollars, and $900 adding in the employer's contribution. Today, the maximum Social Security payment is over $24,000 per year, so that's a very good return on that $900 tax. Of course, most workers do not collect the maximum, but neither did they contribute the maximum.

So while those workers of the 1940s did contribute, they are reaping far, far more benefits than they "earned." Of course, as time passed, Congress greatly increased the amount of the tax, so that it is now well over $6,000 per year, but benefits were increased even more, thus significantly contributing to our deficit problem.

I am a senior, and I like getting a bargain as much as anyone, but we really have to consider those young and middle-aged workers who are going to have to pay for our largesse unless some steps are taken.

Allan G. Scott, Towson

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Protect senior programs
    Protect senior programs

    Candidates won't talk about their plans to cut Social Security and Medicare because they know the public won't support such action

  • Is Baltimore back to normal?
    Is Baltimore back to normal?

    Since State's Attorney Marilyn J. Mosby announced charges against six police officers in the death of Freddie Gray Friday, there has been a palpable sense of relief in Baltimore. Large demonstrations planned for Friday and Saturday, which initially raised fears of a repeat of the violence and looting...

  • Policing Baltimore's police
    Policing Baltimore's police

    The death of Freddie Gray and the riots that followed have brought Baltimore's problems to the forefront of national, even international, attention. The drug addiction, poverty, failing schools, health disparities, deteriorating housing, broken families and unemployment that plague neighborhoods...

  • Helping Nepal recover
    Helping Nepal recover

    The shaking started just a few hours before a big early birthday party was scheduled for me; I'll turn 90 in June. I was at my house in Nepal, not far from the center of Patan, a city right next to Kathmandu, talking to my driver, Runjin, about hanging some Tibetan flags in my bedroom. As we both...

  • Baltimore, then and now
    Baltimore, then and now

    Of all the images captured of this week's riots in Baltimore, none was more arresting than that of an irate mother chasing, berating and striking her would-be rioter son.

  • School lessons to be learned from Freddie Gray
    School lessons to be learned from Freddie Gray

    Baltimore can be proud of its civic response to the rioters and to the criminal charges brought against six police officers. We can be optimistic that police brutality will decrease measurably. But the aftermath of the tragedy of Freddie Gray should be far from over. As a city, state and nation,...

  • Carson or O'Malley for pres? [Poll]
    Carson or O'Malley for pres? [Poll]
  • You should be angry over Freddie Gray
    You should be angry over Freddie Gray

    I am angry.