Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion

Stormwater problem is real

Many thanks go to Alison Prost of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation for her explanation of the stormwater fee ("Beyond 'rain tax' rhetoric," May 1).

I would like to add a little historical background. When Europeans first visited the Chesapeake Bay, it was vibrant with aquatic life galore. Over the centuries, it was exploited with oyster beds being destroyed by "traditional oyster collection practices" and unsustainable fishing of the best fish here and along the Atlantic Seaboard. But the real deathblow to the bay came with Hurricane Agnes — not because of the influx of freshwater, but because the pesticides, fertilizers and other waste that washed from the greater Chesapeake and Susquehanna River watershed ended up killing the native underwater fauna forever.

Those grasses were vital for the safety of baby and soft-shell blue crabs until they were large or hardened enough to fend for themselves. While the recovery of rockfish stocks has been applauded by some, the rockfish and now drum fish eat the baby crabs that have no protection from predators because stormwater runoff destroyed their natural habitat.

This damage was compounded by the suburban sprawl, which included all the tract homes having perfect lawns that were marketed as only possible with lots of fertilizer, etc. While the current building code requires rain water to be channeled into the water processing system, in some locales, officials now require that roof gutters be disconnected from the sewer systems with rain water going into aquifers (probably until the sewer systems can be updated and expanded to handle all water disposal). That is why most blue crabs are actually imported from the Gulf of Mexico.

Jack Boak, Baltimore

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Rain tax: Noble goal, unfair execution
      Rain tax: Noble goal, unfair execution

      Kim Coble of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation laments that Maryland county officials are considering rolling back their stormwater remediation fees. ("'Rain tax¿ is rolling back," Jan. 26.) In 2012 the Maryland General Assembly passed HB 987 requiring nine Maryland counties and Baltimore...

    • Rain tax proponents are missing the larger issue
      Rain tax proponents are missing the larger issue

      In her letter to the editor ("The stormwater fee and the will of the voters," March 12), Katherine W. Rylaarsdam has bought into the protecting-the-environment argument too strongly and is ignoring the larger issue.

    • Rubbed the wrong way by the rain tax
      Rubbed the wrong way by the rain tax

      Commentator Mileah Kromer makes it clear that her polls indicate people are dubious of whether stormwater runoff contributes to pollution in the Chesapeake Bay ("The rub of the 'rain tax,'" March 8).

    • The rain tax is unfair because not all pay it
      The rain tax is unfair because not all pay it

      I'm for the stormwater management fee if it is paid by all ("End 'rain tax' ridicule rap, repeal and replace law," Feb. 28). It is ridiculous to tie it some counties and not all. In the state of current dynamics, just about all contribute to the problems, and just about all will benefit from...

    • We all must assume responsibility for the bay
      We all must assume responsibility for the bay

      I think Dan Rodricks' suggestion for a new flush tax is a promising alternative to the storm water management fee —one that would hold us all personally responsible for the health of the Chesapeake Bay ("End 'rain tax' ridicule rap, repeal and replace law," Feb. 28).

    • The voters wanted the 'rain tax' repeal
      The voters wanted the 'rain tax' repeal

      I cannot believe that The House Environment and Transportation Committee voted 14-7 to kill the bill to repeal the "rain tax" ("House panel kills Hogan's stormwater fee repeal," March 6). This was one of Gov. Larry Hogan's platform issues about reducing taxes that helped get him elected, and...

    • The stormwater fee and the will of the voters
      The stormwater fee and the will of the voters

      The House Environment and Transportation Committee rejected Gov. Larry Hogan's proposed repeal of the stormwater management fee ("House panel kills Hogan's stormwater fee repeal," March 6). Proponents of repeal, predictably enough, are complaining that the voters "spoke" last November.

    • Churches should not have to pay stormwater fees [Letter]
      Churches should not have to pay stormwater fees [Letter]

      In response to your paper's recent article about churches paying stormwater fees, I would point out that churches provide heavily discounted space for community groups and that many house affordable kindergarten and nursery school programs and provide food and shelter for at-risk populations...

    Comments
    Loading