Save 75% - Only $49.99 for 1 full year! digitalPLUS subscription offer ends 12/1
NewsOpinion

Craig shifts positions as governor's race approaches

ElectionsExecutive BranchDavid R. Craig

Mel Mintz's recent letter about Republican Harford County Executive David Craig's shift to the far right in preparation for the 2014 governor's race didn't go far enough ("Craig campaign: From moderate center-right to uninformed extreme," Sept. 20).

The so-called "rain tax" that the Harford County Council came up with, and Mr. Craig apparently approved, requires residential property owners to foot most of the bill through a flat rate, regardless of the amount of runoff.

The council and Mr. Craig claim that the proportion of residential impervious surface in the county is 76 percent, but they fail to explain where that number came from. Does it include apartments? These are commercial properties. What about town homes? Many of these are actually commercial properties. Also, just how many of these properties funnel their runoff into the sewer systems?

The charge for commercial properties is $7 per 500 square feet of impervious area.

If I assume that I have a reasonably "average" home and that all of the rain falling on my roof, patio, short sidewalk and driveway constitute impervious areas — and if I ignore the fact that I direct most of the above runoff into flower beds and my lawn — then I am paying at a rate almost three times that of a commercial property.

Of course, for the first year I only have to pay 10 percent. Why?

Why didn't Harford County pass a 1-cent charge like Frederick County? Or refuse to adopt a fee like Carroll County?

Could it be that by adopting a $125 fee they were trying to alienate residential property owners to the current administration? And by only requiring 10 percent the first year, they come off as the "good guys?" What about next year when Mr. Craig and several council members are running for office? Will the fee be $125 then — just in time for the elections?

Mr. Craig recently announced a proposal to repeal the tax during a visit to a local car and truck dealership. Ever notice how much runoff an operation like that generates? Washing cars, gasoline fumes, oil leaks, to name just a few on five acres of impervious surface. But Mr. Craig thinks that's a burden on businesses. Mr. Craig also alludes to being able to do a better job on bay pollution as governor. I suspect that he plans to go to the bay, raise his arms, and the problem will go away. If not, too bad: he's still governor.

While recent Sun articles have mentioned a number of sources for runoff, they did not quantify the amount of pollution coming down the Susquehanna River from Pennsylvania and points north. Just what is Pennsylvanian doing to save the bay?

As for Mr. Craig, I found it interesting that since he has announced his candidacy for governor only now has he suddenly "pledged to stand by Edgewood and drive the criminal element out, while also identifying causes and solutions to the crime problems."

And after nearly a year of protest about the proposed Walmart on Plumtree Road, when various county departments have said they could not do anything and the County Council failed to take any actions, he has weighed in as having "asked Walmart not to build the new store." Big effort!

And after failing to support the budget of Harford County Public Schools, and months of warnings about the possible consequences, he is now berating HCPS for their actions to live within his budget restrictions.

Yet at the same time he was prominent in the groundbreaking for the new $45 million Emergency Center that is apparently being paid for with local taxpayer dollars. We can afford this building but not education?

David L. Easter, Fallston

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
ElectionsExecutive BranchDavid R. Craig
  • Polls are not in public interest
    Polls are not in public interest

    Mileah Kromer discusses the reasons that the results of pre-election polls concerning the race for governor were largely incorrect, particularly the timing of the polls on which media and the campaigns relied ("Hogan and Brown: tortoise and hare?" Nov. 12). I do not doubt that she is largely...

  • Purple Maryland
    Purple Maryland

    It's safe to say the election is over, and we are all anxious to see what "color" our state will be. Are we now red with a base of blue or still blue with a splash of red ("Republican sees spending as key for governor-elect," Nov. 14)?

  • Race played no role in Hogan win
    Race played no role in Hogan win

    I read Thomas Schaller's column ("Race had a role in Hogan's win," Nov. 11) regarding Larry Hogan's win over Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown in the 2014 Maryland gubernatorial election. He basically states that the areas Mr. Hogan won had more white people then black.

  • Reader to The Sun: Hogan won, get used to it
    Reader to The Sun: Hogan won, get used to it

    I agree with letter writer David Byran that Governor-elect Larry Hogan has done Maryland and the entire country a great service ("Good riddance to "O'Malley," Oct. 10).

  • Is Hogan inevitable in 2018?
    Is Hogan inevitable in 2018?

    I couldn't decide whether I was more amused or bemused by Richard J. Cross III's op-ed about the possible Democratic candidates for governor four years from now ("Who will challenge Hogan in 2018?" Nov. 15).

  • Enough with the talk of race in analyzing elections
    Enough with the talk of race in analyzing elections

    Race, racism, racist. I am so tired of hearing these words whenever a candidate loses or a policy is defeated ("Race had a role in Hogan's win," Nov. 11). Lt. Gov. Anthony G. Brown lost to Larry Hogan because Mr. Brown ran one of the worst campaigns in recent Maryland elections. He even...

Comments
Loading