Get unlimited digital access to baltimoresun.com. $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion

Penn State echoes Lancers scandal

So, an elderly man, well-known in his community, heads a charitable organization to serve young boys. Through that organization, he picks out certain boys to serve his sexual interests. His modus operandi is to give special attention to the boys he has chosen, get them alone and contrive a way to get them in a shower. A few people know of his disgraceful activities but don't have the moral backbone to speak up.

Sounds exactly like a certain local judge and the Lancers boys club here in Baltimore about a decade ago. In that case, apparently, the elderly man satisfied himself just looking at the naked little boys. The disgusting part of that scandal is that several "prominent" Baltimoreans had sons in Lancers, knew of the judge's activities, warned their own sons not to shower with the judge, but steadfastly refused to alert other boys or their parents. And they defended him and his behavior vigorously ("he's only looking"). The possibility of a letter of recommendation from the judge for their sons' college applications trumped any interest in protecting children beyond their own.

As we have learned of child abuse within the Catholic Church and now of allegations of the same at Penn State, the unconscionable behavior of parents continues to resonate.

M. Philip Lehr, Lutherville

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Enough of Sandusky, Paterno and Penn State
    Enough of Sandusky, Paterno and Penn State

    It is horrifying to open a newspaper and see Jerry Sandusky again ("Sandusky: Paterno wouldn't allow pedophile," March 26). Just when you thought the Penn State sexual abuse scandal was over, Mr. Sandusky is giving interviews to a crazed documentary filmmaker, John Ziegler.

  • The truth about the Paterno scandal
    The truth about the Paterno scandal

    Your recent article about the Joe Paterno sex abuse case missed the mark ("Report by Paterno family rebuts scandal accusations," Feb. 11). Buried on page 8 was the following dismissive remark: "The 238-page review, conducted by former Pennsylvania Gov. and U.S. Attorney General Dick...

Comments
Loading