Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.

Opinion

News Opinion

U.S. must not concede to Iran [Letter]

The deal reached over the weekend in Geneva is a huge mistake by the U.S. and one that will be regretted when we discover the Islamic Republic of Iran cannot be trusted.

In the past, the Obama administration has suggested it is willing and ready to use force to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear bomb, but now the White House has since early this fall pushed hard for a diplomatic solution — one of actually conceding to Iran.

Such an unwise breakthrough is likely to anger Israel and several lawmakers in Washington who argue that Iran has eluded international nuclear inspectors for years and cannot be trusted and have warned the Obama administration against rushing into a hasty and bad deal.

The United States and its allies, including Israel, which is not party to the talks but has been played a vocal role on the sidelines during recent weeks, have long suspected that Iran is enriching uranium to make a nuclear bomb.

Iranian leaders are lying that the program is purely for peaceful purposes, including for civilian electricity generation and medical research.

No concessions must be made or granted by the United States ever to Iran on that country's ambitions to create a nuclear weapon.

Al Eisner, Silver Spring

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Iran deal a 'Pandora's Box'

    Iran deal a 'Pandora's Box'

    If we believe that Iran will cease its nuclear program and its support for international terrorism after the agreement is signed, we are living in a fool's paradise ("Sen. Ben Cardin says U.S. negotiators got 'awful lot' in Iran deal," July 23). The argument that Iran will no longer develop nuclear...

  • Wishful thinking about the U.S. deal with Iran

    Wishful thinking about the U.S. deal with Iran

    Regarding Ray McGovern's commentary "Is the 'military option' on Iran off the table?" (July 20), much as we'd like to believe this is a good deal for the U.S., the facts suggest otherwise.

  • Iran deal won't lead to a safer world

    Iran deal won't lead to a safer world

    In 1938, the prime ministers of the United Kingdom and France signed a agreement called the Munich Pact with Adolph Hitler. This act effectively sealed the fate of portions of Czechoslovakia.

  • Don't trust Iran deal

    Don't trust Iran deal

    In response to KAL's cartoon of July 19 depicting Republican hawks not trusting a peace dove brought by President Barack Obama under the guise of the Iran Nuke Deal, I have a two word response: Neville Chamberlain.

  • Is the 'military option' on Iran off the table?

    Is the 'military option' on Iran off the table?

    If, as seems likely, President Barack Obama retains enough support to complete the nuclear deal with Iran, it will be largely because enough members of the House and Senate are persuaded by his argument that the only other real option is war.

  • Dubious benefits of Iran deal

    Dubious benefits of Iran deal

    Words matter. Because of this, I tend not to blindly accept what others say (especially those with political ambitions) but choose to verify and often do so by reading source documents. This week, there has been much travail with regards to a deal with the Islamic Republic of Iran, its nuclear...

Comments
Loading

79°