Get unlimited digital access to $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion

Medical marijuana regulations would scare off physicians [Letter]

Faculty at the prestigious Johns Hopkins School of Medicine conclude, in a letter responding to the July 25 article "Medical marijuana rules for doctors raise concerns" that requirements on physicians recommending marijuana for medical use are "not a burden" ("Physicians need periodic checkups in medical marijuana use," Aug. 1)

That might be true in an ideal world. However, imposing unnecessary hurdles for doctors, like mandatory registration and special training, will invariably chill physician participation in the Maryland medical marijuana program.

Of course doctors should educate themselves on the therapeutic effects of cannabis, a process that can only improve the health of their patients. However, many doctors are fearful of what the federal government might do to them. Although this fear is generally misplaced given physicians' right under the First Amendment to recommend cannabis to their patients, most doctors refuse to get involved. An even greater hurdle to doctor participation could be the requirement for doctors to specify the strain, dosage, and amount in their recommendation to patients.

That's why the Natalie M. La Prade Medical Marijuana Commission's proposed rules must relax requirements on physicians to better encourage participation. Even Del. Dan Morhaim, a physician and one of the lead proponents of the legislation passed earlier this year, opposed the proposed "barriers for physicians" and said the rules could deter participation.

Doctors are the backbone to any medical marijuana program, and we must do what we can to encourage, not discourage, their participation.

Gail Rand, Annapolis

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • End America's failed war on marijuana
    End America's failed war on marijuana

    Regarding Daniel Takash's thoughtful commentary on marijuana laws, marijuana prohibition is indefensible ("Marijuana legalization is the only option," Oct. 27).

  • Medical marijuana could help decrease overdoses
    Medical marijuana could help decrease overdoses

    In the article "Overdose patients repeatedly end up in hospital" (Dec. 30), The Sun highlighted a number of strategies to deal with epidemic problem of narcotic abuse. Not mentioned, however, is an article from the August 2014 Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). Significantly it...

  • Pot users treated as non-persons
    Pot users treated as non-persons

    Maryland legislators should take in account U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment in their consideration of what to do with the marijuana laws ("Maryland lawmakers take fresh run at legalizing marijuana," Jan. 31). No state shall deprive a person of their life, liberty and property without due...

  • Fixing Md.'s marijuana law [Editorial]
    Fixing Md.'s marijuana law [Editorial]

    Our view: Already critics are poking holes in the state's pot decriminalization law are becoming clear; lawmakers should fix the obvious problems but otherwise wait to see how it works in practice

  • Repeal destructive drug laws [Letter]
    Repeal destructive drug laws [Letter]

    McKenzie Elliott, the 3-year-old shot to death in Baltimore, is a recent victim of misguided drug laws ("Politicians, churchmen talk policing in Northwest Baltimore," Sept. 9). While I do not support open use of "illegal drugs," I do not find that drug sales or use represent a criminal act....

  • Medical marijuana rules a work in progress [Letter]
    Medical marijuana rules a work in progress [Letter]

    As members of the Natalie M. LaPrade Medical Marijuana Commission's policy subcommittee, we are honored to be able to serve our fellow citizens to develop a program that makes medical marijuana available to those Marylanders who have not found relief from conventional treatments and may benefit...