Get unlimited digital access to baltimoresun.com. $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion

Punish UM law clinic for 'frivolous' suit

While we're "Regulating farms with certainty" (March 18) as The Sun editorializes, let's be certain that we hold the University of Maryland Environmental Law Clinic accountable for their own litigation runoff. It's "outrageous" (your word, not mine) when The Sun suggests that law clinics should be immune from punishment for knowingly representing a frivolous lawsuit. Even Gov. Martin O'Malley registered his concern. In November of 2011 he complained about the "ongoing injustice" of the Environmental Law Clinic pursuing "costly litigation of questionable merit."

Nor is this the only time University of Maryland law clinics have run amok. In the 1980s, Gov. William Donald Schaefer barred those same clinics from using state funds to sue state agencies. And recently, our legislators have asked for an audit of the clinics activities and expenditures. Those clinic expenditures are taxpayers' money. And yet The Sun says, "...requiring taxpayers to foot the bill for a private civil suit is outrageous." You can't have it both ways.

We are all just as endangered as our farmers if the University of Maryland's law school is allowed to persecute citizens with no consequences for their clinic's abuse of power. Maybe the clinic will litigate responsibly when its leadership learns that they are just as affected by the law as their targets are.

Karl Pfrommer, Lutherville

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Cleaner waters mean safer children
      Cleaner waters mean safer children

      A key consideration has always been missing from the debate over funding for cleaning up stormwater damaged waterways and the "rain tax" ("Backtracking on the bay," Jan. 23). All Maryland homes are but a short walk from the nearest waterway. For many, the nearest waterway is a small headwater...

    • Big ships on the Chesapeake Bay follow strict environmental safety rules
      Big ships on the Chesapeake Bay follow strict environmental safety rules

      Please allow me to correct some of the points letter writer Bernard Helinski recently made regarding ships' ballast water polluting the Chesapeake Bay ("Ship ballast a major source of pollution," Jan. 7).

    • The Hogan environmental agenda
      The Hogan environmental agenda

      In appointing former Harford County Executive David Craig to head Maryland's planning department last week, Gov.-elect Larry Hogan acknowledged he's sensitive to criticism of anti-sprawl policies collectively known as "smart growth." He promised to "take a look at" the complaints of local...

    • Ship ballast a major source of pollution
      Ship ballast a major source of pollution

      The Chesapeake Bay Foundation was gracious in giving the polluted waters of the Chesapeake Bay a D-plus. It should have been an F-minus ("Bay grade remains D+ despite improvements," Jan. 5). A major culprit involved with the bay's increased pollution is the shipping industry.

    • Big Chicken must help pay for bay cleanup
      Big Chicken must help pay for bay cleanup

      Dan Rodricks was right on the mark that Maryland's next governor needs to address pollution from agriculture and "consider some common-sense ideas for dealing with the phosphorous runoff." ("Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor," Dec. 13).

    • Excess phosphorous is killing the bay
      Excess phosphorous is killing the bay

      In the days following Dan Rodricks' column "Larry Hogan has a chance to be a green governor" (Dec. 13), your paper has been flooded with letters opposing the phosphorus management tool (PMT) regulations and opposing Mr. Rodricks position. On the surface it would seem that both letters in...

    • Mr. Hogan picks the wrong 'first fight'
      Mr. Hogan picks the wrong 'first fight'

      When farmers' own records show they are spreading far more phosphorus on their fields than is needed to fertilize their crops and studies have demonstrated conclusively that nutrient runoff from those same fields is killing the Chesapeake Bay, attention must be paid. Yet Maryland's incoming...

    • The truth about poultry and pollution
      The truth about poultry and pollution

      A letter published in The Sun on Dec. 19, "Rodricks wrong on Bay pollution," asserted that a report by the Environmental Integrity Project that columnist Dan Rodricks quoted was wrong because it stated that poultry farmers on Maryland's Eastern Shore are polluting the Chesapeake Bay by...

    Comments
    Loading