Get unlimited digital access to baltimoresun.com. $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion

Conflict over Gaza is one-sided [Letter]

When we sweep aside all the rhetoric and public relations on both sides of the latest Israeli-Palestinian hostilities ("Israel has right to self-defense," July 14), what stands out plainly is how ridiculously one-sided the conflict is.

In its aerial offensive, Israel has hit 1,100 targets in tiny Gaza, killing well over 100 and injuring more than 900 with two-thirds of the dead being civilians, as admitted by the Israelis. How many deaths have the Israelis suffered? From what I have heard, through NBC's Saturday night newscast, none, and the 400 Hamas rockets that have managed to get through the sophisticated Israeli defense shield have caused "mostly light injuries."

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has now elected to invade Gaza. If the "collateral damage" of those dead civilians isn't enough, Israel's boots on the ground will surely bring the terrorists around, right? Let us hope those forces show restraint because images of Syria's shattered Aleppo are fresh in our minds.

Hamas surely has gotten out of line, and the Palestinian leadership must rein in its extremists. But Israel, on its part, needs a complete overhaul of its approach to Palestine starting with a new premise — that all human life is valuable and a Palestinian life is no less precious than an Israeli life. When the hostilities subside, what lesson will this bombardment of Gaza have taught Palestine and Israel both? That firepower and bullying and overreaction breed constantly growing waves of resentment and Israel-hating terrorists that will endure in the Near East for generations to come.

Bruce Knauff, Towson

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Why Israel belongs to the Jews
    Why Israel belongs to the Jews

    There can be no question about the centrality of Israel to the Jewish and Christian religions, but the Muslim claim is tenuous to say the least.

  • Making a claim on Israel
    Making a claim on Israel

    G. Jefferson Price's commentary refers to the Arab concern for Palestine ("An odd start to America's romance with Saudi Arabia," Feb. 13). But others have claims to that area. What the Arabs now consider Palestine, Jews call Israel or the Promised Land and Christians call the Holy Land. It...

  • Netanyahu speech: Neither unprecedented nor unwise
    Netanyahu speech: Neither unprecedented nor unwise

    Op-ed writer Frederic Hill ("Netanyahu invitation unwise," Jan. 28) faults House Speaker John Boehner for inviting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to speak to Congress two weeks before Israeli elections. "Democratic nations usually do not interfere in another country's vote," Mr. Hill says.

  • Congress has right to hear Netanyahu
    Congress has right to hear Netanyahu

    In his commentary ("Boehner's unwise move," Jan. 28), Frederic B. Hill claims it was unwise for House Speaker John Boehner to invite Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to speak at a joint session of Congress because it shows deference toward him before an Israeli election.

  • Let Netanyahu speak
    Let Netanyahu speak

    I find it necessary to respond to Frederic B. Hill's odious and erroneous op-ed, "Boehner's unwise move" (Jan. 28).

  • Netanyahu needs to address Congress
    Netanyahu needs to address Congress

    Contrary to Frederic B. Hill's assertions ("Netanyahu invitation unwise," Jan. 27) both Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and House Speaker John Boehner have had little option, considering how the nuclear negotiations with Iran have proceeded.

Comments
Loading