Save 75% - Only $49.99 for 1 full year! digitalPLUS subscription offer ends 12/1
NewsOpinion

Just say no to war with Iran

Religious ConflictsCivil UnrestIranNATOChicago Housing Authority

How fitting! On this year's Veterans' Day we're learning about the next war in the Middle East ("Iran and the bomb," Nov. 11). Now it's Iran that's in the crosshairs. In my opinion the Pentagon has become "too big to fail," and lessons from the recent banking debacles should be applied.

Americans were tricked into a costly war with Iraq, and we're still bogged down in God-forsaken Afghanistan. Our extra-Constitutional military action in Libya was unacceptable, and the U.S. "global police force" is obscene. When will the American people have the guts to say "Enough!"

Sadly, President Obama is in the thick of things — pressing China and Russia to intervene in the Iran situation, while at the same time reining in the war dogs of Israel. Most intelligent Americans should have serious suspicion when reports surface about weapons of mass destruction in an unfavorable nation. The red herring of Iran's nuclear bomb program needs to be seen as nothing more than a run up to the next American Middle East war.

Tragically Congress has sidestepped its duty under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution and has allowed the executive branch to decide when and how this nation goes to war. Furthermore, I don't consider hiding behind the NATO umbrella an excuse for military adventures. Anyone who has studied recent NATO involvements will find out it is the United States that always does all the heavy lifting.

Thank you, Baltimore Sun for "heads up" about our next expensive, mindless, bloody adventure.

Rosalind Nester Heid, Baltimore

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
Religious ConflictsCivil UnrestIranNATOChicago Housing Authority
  • The Libyan model
    The Libyan model

    Our view: Outcome of Libyan elections is an apparent victory for political moderates — and a vindication of the Obama administration's limited engagement there

  • U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce
    U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce

    Having missed a July deadline for reaching an agreement with Iran over its nuclear program, the six world powers party to the talks -- the United States, Russia, China, France, United Kingdom and Germany -- have set November 24 as...

  • Keep talking with Iran
    Keep talking with Iran

    The announcement today that the U.S. and Iran have agreed to extend talks over Tehran's disputed nuclear program is far short of what we might have hoped for. But the extension can't be counted as a failure either. If the goal is to keep up the pressure on Iran's leaders to reach a deal,...

  • Cardin must drop support for more Iran sanctions [Letter]
    Cardin must drop support for more Iran sanctions [Letter]

    Thank you for your support for continuing negotiations in your July 17th "Keep talking with Iran" editorial. U.S. and Iranian negotiators agreed to continue the talks through late November due to the progress they have made already toward peacefully resolving the standoff over Iran's nuclear...

  • Obama foolish to write Khamenei
    Obama foolish to write Khamenei

    To make matters regarding the negotiations with Iran over its nuclear and missile program even worse than what was described by Cal Thomas ("U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce," Nov. 8), it is now known that President Barack Obama chose to contact Ayatollah Khamenei during that...

  • Keep talking with Iran [Editorial]
    Keep talking with Iran [Editorial]

    Our view: With nuclear talks likely to be extended, it's crucial that Congress continue to give the administration room to negotiate

  • U.S. should end Iran sanctions [Letter]
    U.S. should end Iran sanctions [Letter]

    The recent commentary, "An enemy revisited" (July 13), correctly states that in witnessing the harsh realities "the United States would do well to reassess its view on Iran." In fact, we should have a dialogue and trade with Iran, a country that does not threaten U.S. national interests. The...

  • Syria and Iran are U.S. foreign policy disasters [Letter]
    Syria and Iran are U.S. foreign policy disasters [Letter]

    While reading the summary of key 2013 events, when I got to the description that "Syria blinked," I had to blink myself. I assume the writer meant "Syria winked." At least that's about as much attention as Bashar al-Assad paid to President Barack Obama's red lines — or maybe they were...

Comments
Loading