Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Opinion

News Opinion

Even if Iran had a bomb, it would never use it against the U.S. or Israel

Recently, U.N. inspectors determined that Iran has the technology to design nuclear weapons but found no evidence that Iran intends to build them ("U.K., France alarmed at Iran nuclear report," Nov. 10).

The administration probably also believes the Iranians aren't producing weapons but wants to convince the world that they are so we can get into a military conflict with them.

As things are winding down in Iraq and there is mounting pressure to begin pulling out of Afghanistan, the next country we attack could be Iran, using the excuse that they are producing nuclear weapons.

Yet if Iran were to attacked Israel or the United States it would surely face devastating retaliation. Iran would be annihilated. Why would any country cause its own destruction?

Mark Frank, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce

    U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce

    Having missed a July deadline for reaching an agreement with Iran over its nuclear program, the six world powers party to the talks -- the United States, Russia, China, France, United Kingdom and Germany -- have set November 24 as their new deadline. Iran says there will be no extension if a deal...

  • Sanctions were working in Iran; why are we letting up?

    Sanctions were working in Iran; why are we letting up?

    It seems to me that the sanctions levied on Iran were working or they would not be at the negotiating table ("Netanyahu's pointless speech," March 3). Maybe if we continue this policy, instead of the one we seem to be embracing, they would give up their nuclear program. This is just North Korea...

  • Iran talks peace while it builds its bomb

    Iran talks peace while it builds its bomb

    Unfortunately, the U.S. and Iran's decision to extend their nuclear talks with a new deadline of June, 2015, will only give Iran the opportunity to further its nuclear and ballistic missile programs unhindered ("Keep talking with Iran," Nov. 24).

  • Keep talking with Iran

    Keep talking with Iran

    The announcement today that the U.S. and Iran have agreed to extend talks over Tehran's disputed nuclear program is far short of what we might have hoped for. But the extension can't be counted as a failure either. If the goal is to keep up the pressure on Iran's leaders to reach a deal, keeping...

  • Cardin must drop support for more Iran sanctions [Letter]

    Cardin must drop support for more Iran sanctions [Letter]

    Thank you for your support for continuing negotiations in your July 17th "Keep talking with Iran" editorial. U.S. and Iranian negotiators agreed to continue the talks through late November due to the progress they have made already toward peacefully resolving the standoff over Iran's nuclear program....

  • Congress should not kill Iran deal

    Congress should not kill Iran deal

    South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham got it right on Sunday when he said the framework accord between Iran and the major world powers on Tehran's disputed nuclear program is probably the best deal the Obama administration could have gotten. Of course, he didn't mean it as a compliment...

  • Congress should not dismiss Iran deal

    Congress should not dismiss Iran deal

    Before those opposed to the recent deal with Iran settle on their opposition ("Negotiating with Iran," April 5), I would hope they consider the following.

  • There's good reason not to trust Iran — or Democrats

    There's good reason not to trust Iran — or Democrats

    Most people agree there is a real problem with any relationship with Iran ("Negotiating with Iran," April 3).

Comments
Loading

72°