Get unlimited digital access to $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion

Transit a dubious public expenditure, not an 'investment'

While I agree with Scot Spencer's recent assertion that "investments" must create jobs ("Md. must make sure transit investments create jobs here," Sept. 18), I think an "investment" in mass public transportation is a net loser. Until the farebox can cover at least the operating expenses, don't "invest" a dime in it. The whole concept of mass transit is a social engineering project intended to locate jobs, housing, etc., where the government wants them, not necessarily where people would choose to live and work. It's a form of welfare intended to subsidize those who chose not to use their own cars or for those who have made poor choices in life and can't afford to provide their own transportation.

The whole "investment" word usage is a snow-job as well. We can thank Gov. Martin O'Malley for that word-usage travesty. Progressives (why can't they just call themselves what they are, liberals), seem unable to use the proper words, "spending projects." An "investment" implies a positive return on spending; it's highly likely that any positive benefits would fall well short of the negative total return from mass transit projects. The conundrum faced by such dubious federal laws such as Buy America, is that such mandated buying or hiring programs inflate the cost projections, furthering the gap between expenditure (investment) and benefit. When will the madness end?

Let the market play out, its record of success far exceeds that of government.

Craig R. Piette, Reisterstown

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Put 'trust' back in Transportation Trust Fund [Letter]
    Put 'trust' back in Transportation Trust Fund [Letter]

    A proposed state constitutional amendment creating a firewall for the Transportation Trust Fund will be on the ballot this fall, and while the legislation is flawed, it deserves voter support. The legislation (Senate Bill 829 of 2013) received bipartisan support in both the House and Senate.

  • Highway funding needed — and concrete, too [Letter]
    Highway funding needed — and concrete, too [Letter]

    In regard to the commentary by Brian Dolan ("Get riled up over roadways," July 14), I am in a similar position to Mr. Dolan of the Maryland Asphalt Association, as I work for the Maryland Ready Mix Concrete Association. I, of course, disagree with Mr. Dolan's recent comments disparaging...

  • Concrete is not the problem [Letter]
    Concrete is not the problem [Letter]

    I've known Brian Dolan for nearly 25 years, back to a time when I was the concrete engineer and he was an assistant district engineer, both for the Maryland State Highway Administration. As old colleagues, I wasn't surprised to see his informative commentary on the state of our roads ("Get...

  • America is squandering a precious asset: its highways [Letter]
    America is squandering a precious asset: its highways [Letter]

    Brian Dolan's article, "Get riled up over roadways" (July 14), was extremely well written. Message received loud and clear. We need to be reminded of our crumbling infrastructure as we begin to accept it as the norm.

  • A temporary patch [Editorial]
    A temporary patch [Editorial]

    Our view: With the Highway Trust Fund within weeks of bankruptcy, Congress looks to kick the transportation can down the road

  • Gas tax is no solution [Letter]
    Gas tax is no solution [Letter]

    As usual, The Sun missed the real story — on purpose, I might add ("Pumping up gas prices," July 1). Gas prices have doubled since your savior took office in 2009. President Barack Obama has done almost nothing to make the U.S. energy independent (for example, no nuclear plants have...