Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Opinion
News Opinion

Hospitals ought to be doing less, not more, in the community [Letter]

I read Anne P. Hahn and Michael Reisch's commentary on hospital reform with sad amusement ("Hospitals too must reform under Obamacare," Nov. 11). Their arguments are all backward.

Hospitals actually need to step back from the their invasion into the community, not become more involved in it. As an internal medicine physician in solo practice for 25 years in Baltimore City, I can relate first-hand to the destructive effect hospital involvement has had on the community.

Not that long ago, there was a clear separation between outpatient and inpatient care, and each was independent of the other. This was a good thing. It allowed primary care physicians like myself to know our patients quite well, and we took pride in keeping them out of the hospital.

Doctors themselves, not their answering service or a covering physician, were always available to these patients, typically defusing an "emergency" without the need of emergency medical care and a trip to the hospital.

We would make house calls if necessary, and in the event a patient needed hospital care, we would follow them in the hospital along with their respective specialist to provide both objective insight and a critical eye against unnecessary testing.

When the patient was discharged from hospital, he or she would return to the primary care physician, who had kept abreast of what transpired at the hospital.

This model provided a "continuity of care" that today's health care system can only dream of. As a result of this close patient-doctor relationship, we easily identified the social and economic challenges these patients faced, and we were the physicians best able to address them given the resources available at the time.

All of that is gone. It started with the introduction of "hospitalists" — physicians who ostensibly were made available to follow patients more closely in the hospital, but who in reality represented an extension of the hospitals' attempts at patient (and revenue) control.

Primary care physicians like myself protested, but with little success. And as a result we were eliminated from caring for our patients in the hospital.

Then came the establishment of outpatient, hospital-owned ambulatory care offices, whereby these same hospitals can extend even further their grip on patient flow by effectively eliminating independent practices in the very communities where their services are needed.

And now Ms. Hahn and Mr. Reisch suggest hospitals need to do even more. I say they have already done too much. This is not just my personal opinion; even the American Medical Association has editorialized about the necessity of maintaining independent medical practices as an integral part of a properly functioning health care system.

I suggest the authors go back and do some more research.

Dr. Paul T. Barbera

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • An incomplete report on payments to doctors from drug companies [Letter]

    It actually doesn't do much good to head up an article about payments to doctors by telling readers that a doctor invented a great new device and the company sent him a check for royalties ("Payments to doctors from drug companies, device makers revealed," Oct. 4).

  • Medicare deserves support

    Medicare deserves support

    Last Wednesday, Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush said that we ought to phase out Medicare and that the nation needs to "move to a new system that allows them to have something, because they're not going to have anything." Mr. Bush also praised Rep. Paul Ryan, the architect of a long-term...

  • Health exchange still a hassle

    Health exchange still a hassle

    I found The Sun's editorial, "Beyond the website" (Nov. 23), about how well the new-and-improved Maryland Health Connection had launched to be ironic and not in a good way. Perhaps you should have looked beyond the health insurance website itself to see if the system really had been improved from...

  • Md. health exchange still a problem

    Md. health exchange still a problem

    No matter what one hears, the Maryland Health Insurance Exchange is still a difficult system to navigate ("Give yourself the gift of quality health care," Dec. 3). I have spent the last week trying to create an account, but since my situation isn't typical, I am on my own. The insurance broker...

  • Give yourself the gift of quality health care

    Give yourself the gift of quality health care

    It's December and quickly creeping toward the next holiday season. We have had Black Friday, Small Business Saturday, Cyber Monday and Giving Tuesday. How about taking a step back and giving a gift to yourself?

  • Dems' clout dims

    Dems' clout dims

    Sens. Barbara Mikulski and Benjamin Cardin should realize it's not about the bacon; they were elected to protect the residents of Maryland from federal overreach.

  • Why don't Dems question Md.'s flawed health exchange rollout?

    Why don't Dems question Md.'s flawed health exchange rollout?

    Who are Gov. Martin O'Malley and Attorney General Doug Gansler trying to kid? The reason potential litigation over the flawed rollout of Maryland's health exchange is being postponed is the upcoming election. They are deeply afraid of what Noridian is going to claim about Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown's...

  • How can Ehrlich relish suffering of others?

    How can Ehrlich relish suffering of others?

    It saddens me to see the former congressman and governor of Maryland salivating with anticipation at the thought of depriving millions of Americans of decent health insurance by rolling back the Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare is a varsity stinker," Nov. 23).

Comments
Loading
70°