Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Opinion

News Opinion

Hobby Lobby decision is about denying women health care [Letter]

I am feeling sick looking at the front page of The Sun and trying to understand how young women could be cheering the Supreme Court's decision to allow Hobby Lobby to refuse to cover contraceptive prescriptions ("Court sides with employers in contraception case," June 30).

Admittedly I am pro-choice, but this has nothing to do with abortions. Maybe we need a basic biology lesson. As I've heard it explained by doctors, contraceptives fool the body into believing the woman is already pregnant so that conception is not possible. In other words, there is no conception of a fetus.

Why would anti-abortion people be against this? You are preventing a pregnancy that a woman may decide to abort. Also, do any of these women realize that they may need contraception for a vast variety of issues other than preventing pregnancy?

This is a prescription medication like any other medication, and it is unconscionable that one would have to ask their boss if it is OK to use it. This has nothing to do with religious freedom and everything to do with denying women health care.

Betsy Schindler, Baltimore

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • School birth control makes parents' jobs harder

    School birth control makes parents' jobs harder

    It is the parents' job to teach their children right from wrong. At the very least, schools should not be making the parents' job harder ("Amid teen pregnancy decline, debate renewed about birth control in schools," June 6).

  • Teens have a right to birth control

    Teens have a right to birth control

    As two organizations committed to increasing access to reproductive health care services for all Marylanders, we were glad to see The Sun highlight the availability of contraceptives in school-based health clinics ("Amid teen pregnancy decline, debate renewed about birth control in schools," June...

  • Another furor over contraceptives

    Another furor over contraceptives

    By law, public school students in Maryland do not need their parents' permission to receive reproductive health services from school-based clinics. Nor are the schools under any obligation to inform parents when their children access such services or what kind of services they are given. This has...

  • On birth control, young Republicans get it

    On birth control, young Republicans get it

    Two-thirds of young Republicans believe that every woman should have access to affordable birth control, 65 percent believe that insurance companies should cover contraception without co-pays and 51 percent believe that the federal government should continue to fund contraceptive services for low-income...

  • Pills don't prevent STDs

    Pills don't prevent STDs

    This letter is in response to Susan Reimer's column about the GOP's attitude about birth control ("On birth control, young Republicans get it," April 15). I think Ms. Reimer's opinion is very narrow-minded. While I agree that young people often have premarital sex with no desire to procreate, I...

  • Stokes, like many before him, is wrong on birth control

    Stokes, like many before him, is wrong on birth control

    Readers Diana Philip and Spencer Hall were right to call out City Councilman Carl Stokes for his characterization of teen access to contraceptives as "a racist policy targeting African-American youth" ("Teens have a right to birth control," June 11).

Comments
Loading

75°