Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Opinion

News Opinion

Maryland court goes soft on criminals

Where do I begin? The Maryland Court of Appeals has ruled that the state's mandatory five-year, no parole sentence for gun possession by certain convicted felons cannot stand ("Court voids gun penalty," July 12). As the article noted, "The Court of Appeals ruling in a Baltimore case erased a defendant's mandatory sentence and ordered him resentenced under a more lenient provision of the law."

Isn't it ironic that the case involves Baltimore, a city that is under siege, a city in which runs the blood of both the criminal and the innocent in its streets? It was a great scientific mind, that of Albert Einstein, that constructed the definition of insanity as "doing the same thing over and over again, while expecting a different result." It would seem that we have tried the soft-handed, "lenient" approach to the resolution of our violent crime problem and it has failed, demonstrably so.

Have the Draconian new gun laws that have absolutely no effect whatsoever on the criminally inclined but rather on law-abiding gun owners, had any effect whatsoever on the recent spate of gun violence in Baltimore? Will the abolishment of the death penalty in Maryland only serve to further embolden those would-be murderers in Baltimore who now know that whatever they do, whomever they murder, their prospect of facing the "ultimate penalty" no longer exists?

The imposition of the death penalty in the case of cold-blooded murders is both justified and effective. Since most violent criminals, including our murderers, tend to be recidivists, the death penalty is a certain, sure and final "cure" for recidivism! And here's a hint for our comrade, Gov. Martin O'Malley: Criminals, by definition, do not obey laws!

The action by this so-called high court is despicable, especially so in consideration of the overwhelming violence that is destroying our cities, the deleterious effect of abolishing the death penalty and the laughable (and questionable) effort to control violent behavior involving the use of a gun by making laws that only law-abiding people will obey! Second Amendment rights organizations have for years enthusiastically supported the very same types of laws that this court has just effectively abolished. How do you protect victims by disarming them while at the same time removing laws that may very well have a deterrent effect on their assailants? Tell me, Comrade Governor O'Malley, just how do you do that?

How about this? Let's hold all of the members of the Court of Appeals who voted to abolish that law personally accountable. For instance, the first time that one of those "benefactors" of their insanity murders an innocent victim, each of them is indicted as a co-conspirator in that crime. Maybe they would give a little more thought to their arbitrary and capricious attacks upon the law-abiding citizens whom they are sworn to protect from these criminals!

One more passing thought: Isn't it strange that after a bombing, everyone blames the bomber, but after a shooting, the problem is the gun?

Robert L. DiStefano, Abingdon

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Low hiring standards lead to police brutality
    Low hiring standards lead to police brutality

    I've lived in and around Baltimore for all of my 73 years. My opinion on the problems with our police and fire departments lies with recruiting practices ("U.S. Dept. of Justice reveals plans to review Baltimore Police Dept.," Oct. 21). As a young man I never heard of the problems we're now having....

  • Despite missteps, city police deserve the public's support
    Despite missteps, city police deserve the public's support

    If there were ever a time for residents of Baltimore City to support their police force it's now ("U.S. Dept. of Justice reveals plans to review Baltimore Police Dept," Oct. 20).

  • Unaccountable police are a threat to democracy
    Unaccountable police are a threat to democracy

    If City Solicitor George Nilson is correct in saying that the City Council can't issue a legal requirement that the police conduct themselves in a certain way, the BCPD would represent a private armed force accountable only to the mayor ("City solicitor calls police body camera bill 'illegal,'"...

  • Don't throw money at body cameras
    Don't throw money at body cameras

    Before running off and spending money on body cameras for Baltimore police officers ("City Council panel pushes ahead on body cameras bill," Oct. 29), anyone with any authority who is so convinced that cameras are the answer to police misconduct should read a recent study published this year by...

  • Study shows body cameras can work
    Study shows body cameras can work

    Letter writer Jim Giza plays down the value of body cameras, but the U.S. Department of Justice site to which he refers readers clearly does not ("Don't throw money at body cameras," Oct. 31). In September, the agency published a review, "Implementing a Body-Worn Camera Program: Recommendations...

  • Man found shot, killed on Ensor Street Saturday morning
    Man found shot, killed on Ensor Street Saturday morning

    A man was found Saturday morning on Ensor Street having suffered a fatal gunshot wound, according to Baltimore City Police.

Comments
Loading

41°