Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Opinion

News Opinion

Response of gun rights absolutists woefully inadequate

It was very proper to provide another viewpoint in your article about Gov. Martin O'Malley announcing that there would be a bill addressing the issue of gun control ("Gun control package pending," Dec. 19). However, I found the "perspective" offered by Del. Michael Smigiel to be an example of intellectual dishonesty and lazy thinking.

Mr. Smigiel presented the same old "the problem is," response and I quote, "It is not to attack the firearm; it is to attack the problem, which is people who have a mental health issue." This issue is complex and multi-faceted and requires more than one solution. For Mr. Smigiel to offer this one way to "attack the problem" either means that he is a mental midget incapable of grasping complex problems or he knows that it is more complex than he pretends, and he is merely offering a bone to his constituents and to the National Rifle Association.

And speaking of the NRA, is it any wonder that they are so adamantly opposed to any form of gun control? Have you ever seen their building in Fairfax, Va.? What an impressive building, but I wonder what it costs to maintain it. No wonder they need to constantly keep their membership alert to any "threats" to their Second Amendment rights. It keeps the money flowing, the lights on and the heating bill paid. Not to mention the salaries paid to top executives and their lobbyists.

It has been my observation that people who defend their "Second Amendment rights" and people who support a "Flag Burning Amendment" are the same constituency. I searched for "flag burnings" on Google and did not find much, but Professor Robert Justin Goldstein documented approximately 45 reported incidents of flag burning in the over 200 years between 1777 when the flag was adopted and 1989. I have no way of proving this one way or the other, but I ask, what constitutes a epidemic? Does 45 or 50 flag burnings justify a Constitutional amendment being proposed? How about 77? That is the number of reported killings in just four high-profile cases — Virginia Tech, Columbine, Phoenix and now Newtown.

What do you think we would be hearing from the "protect the flag" people if there had been 77 flag burnings in just the past five years? Instead, we get tired, lazy responses from people like Delegate Smigiel.

Charles F. Ernst, Linthicum

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • NRA's paranoia is catching
      NRA's paranoia is catching

      The Sun's editorial reflecting on the National Rifle Association convention in Nashville is an important statement on how the NRA has devalued our lives and our society ("Guns and the 'permanent darkness,'" April 16).

    • Maryland's gun law is working
      Maryland's gun law is working

      The gun lobby's lawsuit against Maryland's life-saving Firearm Safety Act described in Saturday's front page article does not challenge the constitutionality of the key provision of the act — requiring handgun purchasers to first obtain a fingerprint based background check and license from the...

    • Guns and the 'permanent darkness'
      Guns and the 'permanent darkness'

      By overwhelming margins, polls show Americans support universal background checks for those seeking to purchase a firearm to help keep guns out of the hands of criminals and those who are dangerously mentally ill. Clearly, the last thing you want is for some paranoid personality, ranting and raving...

    • What gun rights and marriage equality (should) have in common
      What gun rights and marriage equality (should) have in common

      In the article, "A unique Maryland marriage sits at center of Supreme Court case considering gay nuptials" (March 13), Carrie Evans, executive director of Equality Maryland, is quoted as saying the following:

    • Punish the gun enablers
      Punish the gun enablers

      Thank you, Dan Rodricks, for continuing to focus on how criminals acquire guns ("Enablers of gun crime hard to trace," April 2). A felon's access to guns would be limited to theft without enablers. And thefts of guns would be easier to trace.

    • Hogan, guns and the attorneys general
      Hogan, guns and the attorneys general

      During the recent gubernatorial campaign, The Sun and several thoughtful citizens were perplexed about the discrepancy between the National Rifle Association's notorious A- rating for Larry Hogan and the candidate's repeated promise that he won't overturn Maryland's gun law if elected. In fact,...

    • Politicians who claim to understand gun crime don't have a clue [Letter]
      Politicians who claim to understand gun crime don't have a clue [Letter]

      The two clowns in Annapolis who claim to understand gun crime don't have a clue ("O'Malley, Brown are kidding themselves with the 2013 Firearms Safety Act," Oct. 6).

    • Md. gun law is working [Letter]
      Md. gun law is working [Letter]

      Jack Mccauley's letter belittling the Firearms Safety Act fails to mention the most important parts of the new law — the requirement that handgun purchasers get a fingerprint-based license and the authority for the state police to regulate firearms dealers ("O'Malley, Brown are kidding themselves...

    Comments
    Loading

    45°