Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99


News Opinion

Tougher firearms laws won't mean fewer gun deaths [Letter]

I read your recent editorial on gun violence and wondered why cities like Chicago and Washington were not mentioned ("Reducing gun deaths," Dec. 10).

These locales historically have had draconian gun laws, yet also high levels of gun violence. If the logic in the article was valid, these locations should be the safest in the country, but they are not.

The last section discussing the mental health restriction on gun ownership suggests it could prevent a tragedy like the one at Sandy Hook. But it failed to mentioned the weapon used was legally purchased by the shooter's mother and was stolen from her by him.

The editorial makes one wonder whether the writer was reporting a politically correct position instead of unbiased information.

Don't misunderstand me, I agree with the fingerprinting and the mental health exclusion. I believe anyone who has a Maryland handgun permit should have to qualify with the weapon before the permit is reissued.

I do have concerns about the license provision, however. You have to pass the background check before you get the license, so what is the point of the license?

If you fill out all the required forms, the information on the weapon's ownership is easily available to those who need it. Requiring a license appears to be redundant and simply another "tax" explained away as a fee.

John Laing, Baltimore

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • What gun rights and marriage equality (should) have in common

    What gun rights and marriage equality (should) have in common

    In the article, "A unique Maryland marriage sits at center of Supreme Court case considering gay nuptials" (March 13), Carrie Evans, executive director of Equality Maryland, is quoted as saying the following:

  • Maryland's gun law is working

    Maryland's gun law is working

    The gun lobby's lawsuit against Maryland's life-saving Firearm Safety Act described in Saturday's front page article does not challenge the constitutionality of the key provision of the act — requiring handgun purchasers to first obtain a fingerprint based background check and license from the...

  • Guns and the 'permanent darkness'

    Guns and the 'permanent darkness'

    By overwhelming margins, polls show Americans support universal background checks for those seeking to purchase a firearm to help keep guns out of the hands of criminals and those who are dangerously mentally ill. Clearly, the last thing you want is for some paranoid personality, ranting and raving...

  • NRA's paranoia is catching

    NRA's paranoia is catching

    The Sun's editorial reflecting on the National Rifle Association convention in Nashville is an important statement on how the NRA has devalued our lives and our society ("Guns and the 'permanent darkness,'" April 16).

  • NRA selectively interprets 2nd Amendment

    NRA selectively interprets 2nd Amendment

    As sure as nine people have been butchered by yet another gun-wielding maniac, there will be an outcry for more laws controlling the sale and registration of firearms, and the NRA will again claim they are heroically upholding the Second Amendment rights of every American citizen by opposing such...

  • Hogan, guns and the attorneys general

    Hogan, guns and the attorneys general

    During the recent gubernatorial campaign, The Sun and several thoughtful citizens were perplexed about the discrepancy between the National Rifle Association's notorious A- rating for Larry Hogan and the candidate's repeated promise that he won't overturn Maryland's gun law if elected. In fact,...