Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99


News Opinion

Jesus didn't condone marriage equality [Letter]

Madeleine Mysko's recent commentary advised that 645 commissioners of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church USA will vote later this month whether to accept marriage equality for the LGBTQ community ("Presbyterians to vote on marriage equality," June 6).

She observed that real people from that community will surround those commissioners, reminding them that the issue concerns the harm to families that results when couples are denied marriage and also that "it's not just about the interpretation of certain passages in the Bible."

In my opinion, LGBTQ advocates are trivializing as mere "interpretation" the significance of the "certain passages" in question, which are by no means trivial for practicing Christians.

Christians of every stripe believe that it is through the divine benevolence of Jesus Christ that they can be spared punishment for their sins in the next life. Also directly relevant is their theological instruction holding that Jesus was well schooled in the Hebrew scriptures, including those to which Ms. Mysko referred.

Christians in no way presume to hold Jesus answerable to his followers. But they cannot fail to see that a choice by Him to have ignored any fundamental fallacy in the scriptures would discredit the deified standing He commands.

However, appeals for marriage equality have not been supported by New Testament evidence that Christ recognized error in the Old Testament passages and was accordingly guided by His divine benevolence to discredit them. Christians can therefore draw only the conclusion they consider inescapable: the scriptures condemning homosexual conduct were deemed valid by their Lord Jesus.

LGBTQ advocates are in reality asking Christians to adopt an alternative conclusion that, because Christ took no exception to the scriptures in question, claims of His divinity and benevolence are simply untenable. Consequently they must recognize that the marriage equality they seek can be granted with integrity solely by those Christians who have been persuaded to disavow their faith in a divine Jesus.

Dennis G. Saunders, Columbia

To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Religious freedom and the Constitution
    Religious freedom and the Constitution

    What many people forget is that the framers of our Constitution, through the First Amendment, sought to guarantee both freedom of religion and freedom from religion ("Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof").

  • The 'war for gay rights' has no winners or losers
    The 'war for gay rights' has no winners or losers

    Columnist Jonah Goldberg's recent commentary about Indiana's Religious Freedom and Restoration Act missed the point ("How do 'religious freedom' acts encourage discrimination?" April 3).

  • Religious beliefs can't excuse discrimination
    Religious beliefs can't excuse discrimination

    A recent suggestion that some people should be exempt from serving gays because of their religious beliefs is nonsense. If you are licensed to provide a service or employed by the government to do so, you are required to perform that service without unlawful discrimination. Neither government employment...

  • Equality in Alabama
    Equality in Alabama

    These are heady days for advocates of marriage equality. The Supreme Court is due to hear arguments this spring in a group of cases that could settle the question of a national Constitutional right to same-sex marriage, and this week, a decision not to enter a stay on the enforcement of a federal...

  • Court's silence on marriage speaks volumes [Editorial]
    Court's silence on marriage speaks volumes [Editorial]

    Our view: Same-sex marriage is set to be legal in a majority of states, making eventual Supreme Court victory appear inevitable

  • Yes, some people do follow the Bible to the letter
    Yes, some people do follow the Bible to the letter

    In his recent column ("The conservative case for same-sex marriage," March 29), Eddie Zipperer gives three reasons why conservatives should favor same sex marriage. I find his second, poking fun at the Bible, to be both offensive and ignorant.

  • Indiana learns discrimination is bad business
    Indiana learns discrimination is bad business

    The leaders of large corporations have not generally been at the vanguard of civil rights movements in this country. The average CEO is usually more concerned about stock valuations and quarterly dividends than about fighting discrimination. And when was the last time you saw the money-hungry NCAA...

  • Selective reading of Leviticus won't justify bigotry
    Selective reading of Leviticus won't justify bigotry

    Letter writer Adam Goldfinger objected to Eddie Zipperer's references to Leviticus and states that he does indeed try to follow the laws in this book ("Yes, some people do follow the bible to the letter," April 3). I find myself wondering how many people Mr. Goldfinger has personally stoned to...