Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
News Opinion

Jesus didn't condone marriage equality [Letter]

Madeleine Mysko's recent commentary advised that 645 commissioners of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church USA will vote later this month whether to accept marriage equality for the LGBTQ community ("Presbyterians to vote on marriage equality," June 6).

She observed that real people from that community will surround those commissioners, reminding them that the issue concerns the harm to families that results when couples are denied marriage and also that "it's not just about the interpretation of certain passages in the Bible."

In my opinion, LGBTQ advocates are trivializing as mere "interpretation" the significance of the "certain passages" in question, which are by no means trivial for practicing Christians.

Christians of every stripe believe that it is through the divine benevolence of Jesus Christ that they can be spared punishment for their sins in the next life. Also directly relevant is their theological instruction holding that Jesus was well schooled in the Hebrew scriptures, including those to which Ms. Mysko referred.

Christians in no way presume to hold Jesus answerable to his followers. But they cannot fail to see that a choice by Him to have ignored any fundamental fallacy in the scriptures would discredit the deified standing He commands.

However, appeals for marriage equality have not been supported by New Testament evidence that Christ recognized error in the Old Testament passages and was accordingly guided by His divine benevolence to discredit them. Christians can therefore draw only the conclusion they consider inescapable: the scriptures condemning homosexual conduct were deemed valid by their Lord Jesus.

LGBTQ advocates are in reality asking Christians to adopt an alternative conclusion that, because Christ took no exception to the scriptures in question, claims of His divinity and benevolence are simply untenable. Consequently they must recognize that the marriage equality they seek can be granted with integrity solely by those Christians who have been persuaded to disavow their faith in a divine Jesus.

Dennis G. Saunders, Columbia

To respond to this letter, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Marriage equality can't wait

    Marriage equality can't wait

    In 1967 when the U.S. Supreme Court struck down laws banning interracial marriage in Loving v. Virginia, there was not a single dissent. Never mind that Virginia's anti-miscegenation statute had been in the books since 1924. The justices unanimously found discrimination in the institution of marriage...

  • How will Kennedy vote on same-sex marriage?

    How will Kennedy vote on same-sex marriage?

    As a long-time civics teacher I follow the Supreme Court's decisions very carefully. I have long admired Justice Anthony Kennedy because he is the swing vote on the court and his decisions are often unpredictable.

  • Court's silence on marriage speaks volumes [Editorial]

    Court's silence on marriage speaks volumes [Editorial]

    Our view: Same-sex marriage is set to be legal in a majority of states, making eventual Supreme Court victory appear inevitable

  • Religious beliefs can't excuse discrimination

    Religious beliefs can't excuse discrimination

    A recent suggestion that some people should be exempt from serving gays because of their religious beliefs is nonsense. If you are licensed to provide a service or employed by the government to do so, you are required to perform that service without unlawful discrimination. Neither government employment...

  • Equality in Alabama

    Equality in Alabama

    These are heady days for advocates of marriage equality. The Supreme Court is due to hear arguments this spring in a group of cases that could settle the question of a national Constitutional right to same-sex marriage, and this week, a decision not to enter a stay on the enforcement of a federal...

  • Yes, some people do follow the Bible to the letter

    Yes, some people do follow the Bible to the letter

    In his recent column ("The conservative case for same-sex marriage," March 29), Eddie Zipperer gives three reasons why conservatives should favor same sex marriage. I find his second, poking fun at the Bible, to be both offensive and ignorant.

  • Get states out of the marriage business

    Get states out of the marriage business

    In light of the recent Supreme Court on same sex marriage being protected under the Constitution ("Freedom to marry," June 27), there is now a movement afoot in Montana by a Mormon, Nathan Collier, who is legally married to Vicki, to be allowed to marry his second wife, Christine. Many have predicted...

  • Selective reading of Leviticus won't justify bigotry

    Selective reading of Leviticus won't justify bigotry

    Letter writer Adam Goldfinger objected to Eddie Zipperer's references to Leviticus and states that he does indeed try to follow the laws in this book ("Yes, some people do follow the bible to the letter," April 3). I find myself wondering how many people Mr. Goldfinger has personally stoned to...