Summer Savings! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Opinion
News Opinion

There is nothing positive to be gained from allowing gays to marry, and much to lose

Regarding your editorial urging the Maryland General Assembly to pass a same-sex marriage bill, I have to disagree ("A vote of conscience," Jan. 31). Our country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles. The concept of separation of church and state was intended to keep the government out of religion, not to keep religion out of the government.

Religious arguments aside, the fact that openly gay individuals hold prominent positions in all professional fields demonstrates that there are no civil rights issues being violated. Even Christians as a group, who are among the most vocal opponents of the bill, accept homosexual individuals as human beings, even if we disagree with their lifestyle.

It is what the Bible teaches. That point was brought out repeatedly in the Marriage and Family Rally outside the State House this week.

Yes, there are those who call themselves Christians who are bigoted. But they are the exception rather than the rule, and they are acting outside the teachings of Christ. Unfortunately, it is the few bigots who receive all the media attention that present the public with a distorted view of Christianity.

Furthermore, marriage is no assurance that couples will have the right to represent their significant other in the event of incapacitation. The only way to assure that is though a legal power of attorney assigning that right. This entails a trip to a lawyer's office. For example, look at the Terri Schiavo case. How many years was that case in court before her husband was allowed to take her off life support? They were a heterosexual, legally married couple, but their marriage license wasn't much help to Ms. Schiavo's husband.

Regarding benefits, heterosexual couples, and even single, widowed or divorced individuals have the same issues with benefits that homosexual couples do. The only solution for that is diligence in keeping one's affairs in order, but diligence is independent of marital status.

An example of a cultural change that started out with good intentions but turned out badly was the no-fault divorce, which was intended to simplify the breakup of marriages. Instead it opened a floodgate of fathers abandoning their families, which in turn led to an increase in the number of families in poverty.

Another example: The Supreme Court legalized abortion in all 50 states. Many said this would bring about a situation in which every child who was born was wanted. Instead, over 48 million babies have been aborted, and child abuse is off the charts.

No matter what humans think, when we change God's design things become dangerous. There is nothing positive to be gained by passing a same sex-marriage bill, but much to lose.

LaVerne Cash, Bel Air

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Marriage equality can't wait

    Marriage equality can't wait

    In 1967 when the U.S. Supreme Court struck down laws banning interracial marriage in Loving v. Virginia, there was not a single dissent. Never mind that Virginia's anti-miscegenation statute had been in the books since 1924. The justices unanimously found discrimination in the institution of marriage...

  • How will Kennedy vote on same-sex marriage?

    How will Kennedy vote on same-sex marriage?

    As a long-time civics teacher I follow the Supreme Court's decisions very carefully. I have long admired Justice Anthony Kennedy because he is the swing vote on the court and his decisions are often unpredictable.

  • Court's silence on marriage speaks volumes [Editorial]

    Court's silence on marriage speaks volumes [Editorial]

    Our view: Same-sex marriage is set to be legal in a majority of states, making eventual Supreme Court victory appear inevitable

  • Religious beliefs can't excuse discrimination

    Religious beliefs can't excuse discrimination

    A recent suggestion that some people should be exempt from serving gays because of their religious beliefs is nonsense. If you are licensed to provide a service or employed by the government to do so, you are required to perform that service without unlawful discrimination. Neither government employment...

  • Equality in Alabama

    Equality in Alabama

    These are heady days for advocates of marriage equality. The Supreme Court is due to hear arguments this spring in a group of cases that could settle the question of a national Constitutional right to same-sex marriage, and this week, a decision not to enter a stay on the enforcement of a federal...

  • Yes, some people do follow the Bible to the letter

    Yes, some people do follow the Bible to the letter

    In his recent column ("The conservative case for same-sex marriage," March 29), Eddie Zipperer gives three reasons why conservatives should favor same sex marriage. I find his second, poking fun at the Bible, to be both offensive and ignorant.

  • Get states out of the marriage business

    Get states out of the marriage business

    In light of the recent Supreme Court on same sex marriage being protected under the Constitution ("Freedom to marry," June 27), there is now a movement afoot in Montana by a Mormon, Nathan Collier, who is legally married to Vicki, to be allowed to marry his second wife, Christine. Many have predicted...

  • Selective reading of Leviticus won't justify bigotry

    Selective reading of Leviticus won't justify bigotry

    Letter writer Adam Goldfinger objected to Eddie Zipperer's references to Leviticus and states that he does indeed try to follow the laws in this book ("Yes, some people do follow the bible to the letter," April 3). I find myself wondering how many people Mr. Goldfinger has personally stoned to...

Comments
Loading
81°