Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Opinion

News Opinion

Sun should support free speech

The positions The Sun's writers have taken recently with regard to free expression have not fulfilled its higher calling to support these paramount values.

First, the essential theme of the Sun's April 3 article about Towson University and the white student union ("Towson U. fights back against negative attention") was that the university needed to apologize for not interfering with the attempts of certain students to form a white student union. But the university should have been commended, not condemned, for taking a principled stand in allowing unpopular speech, weak-kneed though its support may have been.

Second, Kevin Cowherd in his April 11 article ("Tigers' new cage is all the rage") reprised the same theme: the university "has been in the news for all the wrong reasons," i.e., because of the "knuckleheads" who attempted to form a white student union. But if advocating free expression for unpopular speech by "knuckleheads" "makes news for the wrong reasons," then Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. and many other distinguished figures in our history made news for the wrong reasons, repeatedly. Perhaps they should have just kept quiet and talked only about sports, as Mr. Cowherd apparently thinks is the wiser course.

Third, in the April 13 editorial on Dr. Ben Carson, the Sun argues that Dr. Carson's First Amendment rights were not infringed by the pressure that may (or may not) have been imposed on him to withdraw as the Johns Hopkins University Medical School's commencement speaker ("The price of free speech"). That is true, strictly speaking.

But the larger truth is that the First Amendment derives from cultural and religious values that respect dissident views and that without those cultural values mere laws will wither and die. We should give a forum to those with whom we disagree. In this regard, one wonders what criteria Hopkins will now impose in selecting Dr. Carson's replacement. Perhaps: (1) please don't say anything controversial, and (2) check everything you said anywhere in the last 10 years to see if it might have offended anyone.

Have we really become such hypersensitive souls that we cannot bear even to listen to someone with whose views we strongly disagree?

The Sun should bear in mind that the First Amendment protects not only unpopular actors such as the Towson white student union but freedom of the press. If The Sun poisons the tree of liberty, it not only betrays its higher calling but harms itself.

Glen Allen, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Ben Carson's conservative approach to health care reform [Letter]

    Ben Carson's conservative approach to health care reform [Letter]

    I wonder why letter writer S. R. Cohen is so quick to attack neurosurgeon Ben Carson when he seems so unaware of Mr. Carson's beliefs ("Ben Carson commits 'values malpractice,'" March 16).

  • Carson is no 'simpleton'

    Carson is no 'simpleton'

    I am a 50-something, Jesuit-educated, Libertarian-leaning registered Democrat who has been reading Thomas F. Schaller's column for years. He has the luxury of at least being accepted around liberals and only being castigated by conservatives. Libertarian thinkers eventually are attacked by both...

  • Ben Carson's own words show he's ill-suited to office

    Ben Carson's own words show he's ill-suited to office

    Thomas Schaller makes a strong case that Dr. Ben Carson should stick to medicine ("Carson should stick to medicine," Feb. 3). Mr. Schaller did not need to stray far for evidence: He cites Dr. Carson's own public pronouncements for curing the nation's ills, namely, his call for a flat tax which...

  • Carson v. Obama

    Carson v. Obama

    How can columnist Thomas F. Schaller compare Michael Jordan trying to hit a 95-mph fastball to Ben Carson being president of the United States? Is he saying a community organizer was more prepared to be president than Dr. Carson ("Ben Carson should stick to medicine," Feb. 3)?

  • Is Carson's race the problem?

    Is Carson's race the problem?

    I find it interesting that columnist Thomas F. Schaller can champion our "community organizer" president as all-knowing, intelligent and, of all things, competent, yet Ben Carson, a world-renowned brain surgeon and Herman Cain, a very successful business owner, don't have the ability to be president,...

  • Carson speaks truth

    Carson speaks truth

    Thomas F. Schaller's analogy comparing Michael Jordan's attempt to play baseball to Ben Carson's qualifications to be president is asinine ("Carson, stick to medicine," Feb. 4). Why don't we just expand that assertion to dissuade political science teachers from becoming newspaper columnists?

  • Carson should run for president

    Carson should run for president

    Columnist Thomas F. Schaller makes reference to some prominent individuals who failed to succeed in business, but he may be too young to remember that a shopkeeper named Harry S. Truman defeated a favored Republican, Thomas E. Dewey, in 1946 ("Ben Carson should stick to medicine," Feb. 3).

  • Columnist, heal thyself

    Columnist, heal thyself

    Thomas F. Schaller's piece on Ben Carson is nothing more than an ad hominem attack, an attack more appropriate to a blog from the fever swamps of the ideological left than a nationally-recognized newspaper ("Carson, stick to medicine," Feb. 4). Frank Kent has to be spinning in his grave.

Comments
Loading

79°