Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion

Anti-fracking legislation is not premature

Commentator Harry Alford's claim that focusing on fracking legislation in Maryland constitutes a waste of time and effort suggests a shocking ignorance of what is happening in other states ("Anti-fracking legislation is premature," March 7). Maryland's proposed fracking bills are designed to create an orderly, safe process that states elsewhere have not achieved.

How can the Black Chamber of Commerce claim to seek economic empowerment for African-American communities, yet support the natural gas industry? Drilling for natural gas and oil has given rural areas in Wyoming levels of air pollution equivalent to those in Los Angeles.

In southwestern Pennsylvania a new health clinic was set up last year just to focus on the environmental health problems of people living near gas wells. Advocates for public health are constantly working to reduce the higher incidence of diseases among African-Americans, and new research shows that respiratory illness, developmental problems, and cardiovascular disease are linked to pollution.

Environmental injustice is when one group of people bears a disproportionate share of the negative consequences of industrial or commercial operations. This is exactly what is happening with fracking in other states. It is not the kind of economic empowerment that the National Black Chamber of Commerce should be promoting.

The time to insure that Marylanders are not victimized by sloppy industrial practices and poor state regulations is now, before fracking starts.

Mr. Alford characterizes natural gas as offering "so many benefits to our state" along with "no immediate risks." He is wrong.

Investing in natural gas diverts us from renewable energy sources. Natural gas wells and pipelines leak tremendous amounts of methane into the atmosphere, creating an immediate threat to air quality, posing danger from explosions and exacerbating emissions of greenhouse gases. Meanwhile, claims of job creation are greatly overstated.

Mr. Alford is right about one thing: Maryland's study of fracking is just beginning, despite the fact that the governor's study commission has been in place since fiscal 2011.

This is why we need fracking legislation: To make sure those studies are conducted in a robust way, addressing human health and the full economic impact of drilling, including the costs of environmental damage.

Isn't economic empowerment something all Marylanders are entitled to, not just those who reap the profits from natural gas extraction? I am deeply concerned about the health disparities and economic inequities experienced by communities of color and low-income populations that are exposed to industrial pollution. I'm surprised that Mr. Alford and his organization are not.

Rebecca Ruggles

The writer is director of the Maryland Environmental Health Network.

Correction: Due to an editing error, an earlier version of this letter included an incorrect description of research into the health effects of pollution. The Sun regrets the error.

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • The frackers are coming, the frackers are coming!
      The frackers are coming, the frackers are coming!

      History, myth, and legend informs those of us in the United States that on a chilly night in 1775 a relative of mine mounted his horse, and as loudly as he could, rode through the streets of Boston proclaiming that an invading fleet was entering the harbor aiming to muzzle and arrest any acts...

    • Thank God Hogan wasn't in charge of the fracking report
      Thank God Hogan wasn't in charge of the fracking report

      Maryland's recent report on fracking safely is an example of smart governing ("O'Malley administration sets out path to fracking in Md.," Nov. 25). In July 2011, Gov. Martin O'Malley ordered a commission to be formed by the Maryland Department of the Environment and the Department of Natural...

    • There is no safe fracking, Mr. O'Malley
      There is no safe fracking, Mr. O'Malley

      Gov. Martin O'Malley's announcement that the state will move forward with establishing regulations for hydraulic fracturing — fracking — in Maryland leaves behind a terrible legacy. He has secured his place in history as the one who opened up the state to the inherent risks of the...

    • A frackless future for Maryland
      A frackless future for Maryland

      Jim Guy's "No fracking in Western Md." (Oct. 10) and Robert Lawrence's "Time to ban fracking, O'Malley" (Oct. 10) make an indisputable case for keeping fracking out of Maryland.

    • Fracking's risks are manageable, so what's the holdup?
      Fracking's risks are manageable, so what's the holdup?

      Your recent editorial argued that "the longer we wait before embracing fracking, the better informed we will be" ("Fracking still worrisome," Oct. 7).

    • O'Malley should ban fracking
      O'Malley should ban fracking

      Based on Robert Lawrence's commentary, "Ban fracking, O'Malley" (Oct. 10), we have to be ever grateful that Gov. Martin O'Malley and the legislature decided to "look before they leap" by requiring a health study before authorizing hydraulic fracturing to drill for natural gas in Maryland. Now...

    Comments
    Loading