Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion

Anti-fracking legislation is not premature

Commentator Harry Alford's claim that focusing on fracking legislation in Maryland constitutes a waste of time and effort suggests a shocking ignorance of what is happening in other states ("Anti-fracking legislation is premature," March 7). Maryland's proposed fracking bills are designed to create an orderly, safe process that states elsewhere have not achieved.

How can the Black Chamber of Commerce claim to seek economic empowerment for African-American communities, yet support the natural gas industry? Drilling for natural gas and oil has given rural areas in Wyoming levels of air pollution equivalent to those in Los Angeles.

In southwestern Pennsylvania a new health clinic was set up last year just to focus on the environmental health problems of people living near gas wells. Advocates for public health are constantly working to reduce the higher incidence of diseases among African-Americans, and new research shows that respiratory illness, developmental problems, and cardiovascular disease are linked to pollution.

Environmental injustice is when one group of people bears a disproportionate share of the negative consequences of industrial or commercial operations. This is exactly what is happening with fracking in other states. It is not the kind of economic empowerment that the National Black Chamber of Commerce should be promoting.

The time to insure that Marylanders are not victimized by sloppy industrial practices and poor state regulations is now, before fracking starts.

Mr. Alford characterizes natural gas as offering "so many benefits to our state" along with "no immediate risks." He is wrong.

Investing in natural gas diverts us from renewable energy sources. Natural gas wells and pipelines leak tremendous amounts of methane into the atmosphere, creating an immediate threat to air quality, posing danger from explosions and exacerbating emissions of greenhouse gases. Meanwhile, claims of job creation are greatly overstated.

Mr. Alford is right about one thing: Maryland's study of fracking is just beginning, despite the fact that the governor's study commission has been in place since fiscal 2011.

This is why we need fracking legislation: To make sure those studies are conducted in a robust way, addressing human health and the full economic impact of drilling, including the costs of environmental damage.

Isn't economic empowerment something all Marylanders are entitled to, not just those who reap the profits from natural gas extraction? I am deeply concerned about the health disparities and economic inequities experienced by communities of color and low-income populations that are exposed to industrial pollution. I'm surprised that Mr. Alford and his organization are not.

Rebecca Ruggles

The writer is director of the Maryland Environmental Health Network.

Correction: Due to an editing error, an earlier version of this letter included an incorrect description of research into the health effects of pollution. The Sun regrets the error.

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Sierra Club opposes fracking plan
      Sierra Club opposes fracking plan

      A recent article reported that the Sierra Club "praised the administration's conclusions" regarding opening the state to fracking ("O'Malley administration sets out path to fracking in Md.," Nov. 25).

    • Fracking deserves a pause
      Fracking deserves a pause

      The Maryland House of Delegates gave final approval Tuesday to legislation that would place a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking," to produce natural gas in this state for the next three years. The vote was 93-to-45, a two-thirds majority. The proposal offers the kind...

    • Stop fracking in Md. before your water starts tasting like licorice
      Stop fracking in Md. before your water starts tasting like licorice

      Maryland residents must support the moratorium on fracking and the "gold standard regulations" ("Health, environmental groups seek fracking moratorium," Feb. 5).

    • Why ruin Garrett County?
      Why ruin Garrett County?

      As a retired couple, one of many living in Garrett County, my wife and I find the possibility of fracking wells and all that comes with them completely distressing ("The risks of fracking outweigh the potential benefits," March 3). Having come from a metropolitan area industrialized to the...

    • Fracking poses problems for Western Md.
      Fracking poses problems for Western Md.

      Last week, a Garrett County resident testified in Annapolis that Maryland should proceed with fracking, the dangerous industrial practice recently banned in New York. He claimed that Western Maryland needs the jobs. I ask, what jobs?

    • The risks of fracking outweigh the potential benefits
      The risks of fracking outweigh the potential benefits

      State Sen. Bobby Zirkin's bill putting strict limits on fracking demonstrates the growing concern elected officials have about opening Maryland's doors to the oil and gas industry ("Frosh wades into fracking fight," Feb. 25).

    • Go slow on fracking
      Go slow on fracking

      Fracking is a hot topic in Annapolis this year, with bills in the legislature that would hit the pause button and impose strict liability standards on companies that want to drill in the state before the oil and gas industry starts fracking in Western Maryland ("Frosh wades into fracking...

    • Western Md. should resist siren call of fracking
      Western Md. should resist siren call of fracking

      I personally overheard a federal supervisor during the construction of the United States Penitentiary, Hazelton in West Virginia laugh about "pulling the wool over the residents' eyes with the promise of jobs." Most workers were imported and residents got a few low-paying jobs. They also got...

    Comments
    Loading