Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
News Opinion

Political right misrepresents world events

I try to follow the political discussion in the U.S. and am amazed how much effort it takes even to begin to be well-informed. If you are serious about being informed, you can't be the least bit lazy and depend on a couple of pundits to shape your world view. You have to get out there and study the people you disagree with — in their own words, not the pundits' words. Information comes at you like a fire hose and you better not be off to the side sipping out of a dripping garden hose.

I was just reading some editorial about how President Barack Obama is so naive and goes around the world apologizing for past American actions. The premise is that our foreign policy is in shambles because of him. That is so naive.

These people need to take a sip from the fire hose. Take the Middle East. Major changes are going on. Dictators are being booted out and previously powerless are gaining power in Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen and Libya. It looks like Syria might also flip. Do you know what this means? Sure, Islamists may appear to gain power and they may say anti-American things for a while, but the Islamists can't sit on the side lines and carp anymore. They are now responsible for creating jobs and security for the people. Nothing moderates one's politics more than the responsibility of governing. I think it is great that this evolution in the Middle East is empowering the younger generation with hope and dignity.

Take Iran. The right wing narrative is that Mr. Obama has caved or doesn't know what he is doing. Look at what is actually going on. Instead of a military strike that would unify all Iranians against the U.S. in a nanosecond, a tightening noose of world pressure is forcing the issue. The Iranian oil market is being reduced and the Iranian banks ability to do international transactions is being restricted. Iran is reeling from the economic pressure and showing signs of cracking. Iranians are divided and mostly against their government. They want change. A military strike by the U.S. on Iran's nuclear facilities is still on the table, but if we can get the job done with "smart power," why not? Stay tuned.

If Syria flips, or should I say when it flips, Iran will be isolated. Hezbollah and Hamas will lose their conduit to Iran. The dynamics around Israel will change completely. Iran is supporting Bashar Assad in Syria and most of the newly empowered masses in the Middle East support the overthrow of Mr. Assad, against Iran's interest.

This is great stuff for the interest of the U.S., not to mention the Middle East itself. The people there want jobs and security. They want to get married and have families. They are tired of oppression and extremism. Sure, they have some rough times to get through and the learning curve for governance is long and difficult. But because of the Obama administration the U.S. finds itself on the right side of history. Instead of the empty bluster of a Dick Cheney creating enemies and ridicule at every turn, we have smart power sculpting events behind the scenes.

You guys on the right with your naive Obama apologizing narrative are missing the whole show and you are certainly on the wrong side of history.

Avery Harden, Towson

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • The Libyan model

    The Libyan model

    Our view: Outcome of Libyan elections is an apparent victory for political moderates — and a vindication of the Obama administration's limited engagement there

  • The 'Turkish model' for democracy -- not dictatorship

    Regarding your recent article on the Egyptian presidential elections, Turkey has no claims or aspirations to be a ''model'' for the Middle East ("Slouching toward democracy," June 27). We are ready to share our experience and provide all possible support if asked, and we wish the Egyptian people...

  • Give the new Egyptian president a chance

    Al Eisner, in his letter, "Egyptian election is tragic" (June 29), has substituted opinion for fact when he calls the Muslim Brotherhood "a virulent anti-Semitic organization." Anti-Zionist, yes; but he provides no evidence whatsoever that it is anti-Semitic.

  • Slouching toward democracy

    Slouching toward democracy

    Our view: Egypt's Mohamed Morsi must seize the opportunity presented by his historic election as president

  • Egyptian election results are tragic

    Since it has been determined to be absolutely necessary to overthrow the Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, even though Egypt and Israel had managed to co-exist for several decades, the results are now a tragedy ("Islamist wins Egypt presidency," June 25).

  • A revolution betrayed

    A revolution betrayed

    Our view: The military's power grab threatens to derail Egypt's transition to democracy

  • An unsettled, Islamist Egypt threatens U.S. national security

    President Obama appears ready this week to reinstate $1.5 billion in military aid to Egypt. The International Monetary Fund, with a nod from the U.S., is negotiating a $3.2 billion loan to bail out its broke rulers. Why?

  • Iran deal a 'Pandora's Box'

    Iran deal a 'Pandora's Box'

    If we believe that Iran will cease its nuclear program and its support for international terrorism after the agreement is signed, we are living in a fool's paradise ("Sen. Ben Cardin says U.S. negotiators got 'awful lot' in Iran deal," July 23). The argument that Iran will no longer develop nuclear...