Get unlimited digital access to $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion

Coverage of foreclosure protest lacked facts

This letter is in regard to your recent coverage of the foreclosure protest in Union Square ("Occupy Baltimore members gather to fight foreclosure," Jan. 11). As a reader and subscriber to the online and print editions of The Sun, I am disappointed because the article lacked facts and background information that could have made it great.

It's also a situation that ties into many issues The Sun has covered recently such as "Occupy" protest, the city's high property tax rate, foreclosures, short sales, disillusion at large banks receiving special treatment that little people do not, and human interest about the plight of our elderly.

A quick check of the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation shows that homeowner Lila Kara bought her house on May 9, 2006 for $262,500. She was approximately 60 years old then. The annual property tax bill is $4,479 based on the current assessed value of her house. And she would not receive much, if any, of a Homestead tax credit because she has lived there a short period of time, as your article points out.

That $4,479 a year is in addition to her mortgage payment. Did Ms. Kara not realize how much her taxes would be because her real estate broker failed to explain how property taxes are calculated? Deutsche Bank transferred the house from Ms. Kara on August 18, 2001 for $140,250. Why is there a difference in the price? Did Deutsche Bank take a loss similar to that of a short sale? Could someone look at the foreclosure file in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City?

Next, the reporter should have obtained more background information about Ms. Kara to help the reader understand her situation.

Is the greedy Deutsche Bank responsible for giving a loan without verifying Ms. Kara's income? What is Ms. Kara's income? Has Ms. Kara's health or income situation changed since she bought the house? Did Ms. Kara make a bad business decision assuming she would sell the house in a few years for more than she paid for it? How much was her down payment?

Why have the Occupy protesters chosen to help? Why her? Was it because she contacted them and did they check out her circumstances or just arrange a protest for the first person that walked through their door?

Please provide basic facts and provide background information before you print another article like this. May I suggest an in-depth article of this type on Ms. Kara or a similar person in the future? The lack of facts and background information makes me question why I pay for The Sun.

Charles Fitzpatrick, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Snow falls, climate changes
    Snow falls, climate changes

    For those who have found the cold, snowy winter of 2014-2015 more than mildly irritating and the words, "be grateful you don't live in Boston" insufficiently comforting, today's snowfall may have pushed you over the edge. Not only because it shut down schools, governments and businesses and...

  • From now on, she walks to school
    From now on, she walks to school

    Since there have been parents and kids, each generation has struggled to understand the other. To me, it appears that children today are much less accountable and have fewer responsibilities than I did growing up. One of our kids is an over-achieving, motivated 17-year-old girl. All of her...

  • Reject the proposed merger of Exelon and Pepco
    Reject the proposed merger of Exelon and Pepco

    Since 2008, University Park Community Solar LLC has attempted to make community solar more feasible for other Marylanders, through the organizing and building of one of the first community solar projects in the nation and through our efforts to provide information and free technical...

  • Absurdity at the heart of the latest Obamacare challenge
    Absurdity at the heart of the latest Obamacare challenge

    The determined opponents of the Affordable Care Act lost their legal fight on the merits three years ago when the Supreme Court ruled that one of its central provisions — the requirement that most individuals buy health insurance or pay a penalty — was constitutional. Now they're...

  • Ending judicial elections
    Ending judicial elections

    Electing judges by popular vote is a bad idea. Experience has taught this lesson over and over again. If you want judges to be impartial and fair (or at least appear to be), you don't force them to act like politicians making promises and seeking campaign contributions from the very people...

  • Injustice is resilient, but so are defenders of freedom
    Injustice is resilient, but so are defenders of freedom

    First, they sang "God Will Take Care of You."