Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion

How does shipping LNG abroad promote U.S. energy independence? [Letter]

I'm confused about your report that Virginia-based energy company Dominion wants to convert it's little-used natural gas import terminal at Cove Point into an export facility ("A key win for LNG facility," July 24).

According to your story, shale gas extracted "from Pennsylvania, West Virginia and elsewhere would be piped there, liquefied and shipped via tankers to lucrative foreign markets. Business, labor and many local elected officials back the project, arguing it will generate jobs and help the nation achieve energy independence."

What a nonsensical couple of paragraphs. If it's supposed to help the nation achieve energy independence, why is Dominion allowed to export the liquefied gas to lucrative foreign markets?

The story goes on to say that "opponents contend nearby residents are at risk from a fire or explosion."

So, Dominion puts local residents at risk but gets to ship the gas to lucrative foreign markets and this somehow is supposed to help the nation achieve energy independence? What gibberish.

David Gosey, Towson

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • O'Malley jumps to a pro-fracking conclusion [Letter]
    O'Malley jumps to a pro-fracking conclusion [Letter]

    I was surprised to see in Tim Wheeler's report on the latest Cove Point permit ("State gives gas export facility go-ahead," July 23) that Gov. Martin O'Malley has decided that fracked gas is a bridge fuel and that fracking can be done safely if the government sets the "highest and best"...

  • Why are we exporting natural gas? [Letter]
    Why are we exporting natural gas? [Letter]

    After years of hearing that the U.S. is too dependent on foreign oil, and that our reliance on fossil fuels is ultimately unsustainable anyway, why are we now developing ways to export natural gas ("A key win for LNG facility," July 24)?

  • Cove Point plant threatens nearby residents' health and safety [Letter]
    Cove Point plant threatens nearby residents' health and safety [Letter]

    In its permit ruling last month, the Maryland Public Service Commission stated that the proposed Cove Point liquefied natural gas refinery is not in the public interest and would be a net economic negative for the state. That should have been the end of the discussion and the project should...

  • Delaney's energy policy a muddle [Letter]
    Delaney's energy policy a muddle [Letter]

    Rep. John Delaney's commentary ("Natural gas is the right choice for the U.S.," April 2) speaks for the energy and job needs of Canada, Crimea, Europe, Russia, Ukraine the Midwestern United States and southern Maryland. Unmentioned in this geopolitical academic exercise are the energy and job...

  • For the sake of future generations, Cove Point must be stopped [Letter]
    For the sake of future generations, Cove Point must be stopped [Letter]

    Thank you for covering the controversy regarding the proposed Dominion liquefied natural gas (LNG) export facility at Cove Point ("Calvert County Cove Point opponents, supporters flood state with comments," April 3).

  • Cove Point: Study but decide soon [Letter]
    Cove Point: Study but decide soon [Letter]

    As expected, Mike Tidwell of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network writes that the proposed Cove Point natural gas plant needs to be studied more and various state and federal agencies should weigh in ("Shipping LNG overseas is an ecological mistake," April 3).

Comments
Loading