Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion

The threat of socialism is greatly exaggerated [Letter]

Columnist Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. recently reminded us of Winston Churchill's prescient warning of the dangers of European socialism ("The challenges Churchill faced nearly 70 years ago mirror those of today," Nov. 24).

I admired and liked Mr. Ehrlich as governor and thought he was fine public servant. Sometimes, however, his staying in that same echo chamber of like views allows his rhetoric to go a little overboard.

While Churchill was prescient, his prescience was more directed toward Nazi Germany than toward European socialism. Later in his career he warned mostly of the Soviet Union and its expansionist ambitions in Eastern Europe. I am sure he voiced concern over socialism, but that wasn't his main contribution.

Moreover, Mr. Ehrlich's fear of this nation turning more and more socialist reminds one of earlier fears about the changing nature of our nation and its government. There were many times the same refrain, with different language, has been voiced about government centralization leading to communism or socialism.

Thomas Jefferson feared the nation was turning away from its agrarian character toward the dawning industrial age. Others feared that Andrew Jackson's scalawags would make the nation into more of a democracy. The Know-Nothings predicted gloom and doom out of anxiety over the industrial age. There were even those who predicted that Abraham Lincoln's presidency would lead the country to ruin. And etc., etc., etc.

Yet here we stand, the most powerful successful economy in the world. By the way, Britain and Germany, two of the nations among that European socialist-leaning group, are among the world's top economies. Either we are not turning socialist, or we are — and socialism works.

Mel Mintz, Pikesville

To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Ehrlich too negative, too partisan
    Ehrlich too negative, too partisan

    Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s cocky and aggressive partisanship make it evident why he couldn't govern effectively in Annapolis and was not re-elected for a second term ("Why Obama is viewed as weak," Nov. 30).

  • Ehrlich's delusions of grandeur
    Ehrlich's delusions of grandeur

    The Sun's front page recently carried the article, "Ehrlich entertains presidential hopes" (Dec. 3), yet it was not April 1. Surely, this was a joke. It's even more preposterous than Martin O'Malley running for president!

  • Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'
    Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'

    Though I am 1960s retread boomer and unrepentant liberal who usually disagrees commentator Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., I read his column regularly. No surprise that he recently panned Obamacare — again — but what I never hear from Republicans is the Plan B, i.e., how we deal with the...

  • Obamacare is a 'varsity stinker'
    Obamacare is a 'varsity stinker'

    OK, I can't help myself. Over the past three years, I have written at least a dozen columns critical of Obamacare (a.k.a. The "Affordable Care Act") in this space and devoted an entire chapter to the topic in my book "America: Hope for Change."

  • Hillary all over again
    Hillary all over again

    With the exception of President Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton is the most recognized American politician of this era. Today, she is far and away the Democratic front runner for president. Many believe she is the odds on favorite to win it all — a view supported by a variety of public...

  • What Obama should have said
    What Obama should have said

    Here is what President Barack Obama should have said when he addressed the American people after his party's massive losses in Tuesday's election:

  • Ehrlich mistaken on tax burden
    Ehrlich mistaken on tax burden

    Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. does not look at the big picture. Is this because he is not interested in giving a fair presentation? In his most recent column (tax bill for government at all levels.

  • Ehrlich gets the numbers wrong
    Ehrlich gets the numbers wrong

    I'm often perplexed by the content in Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s column and wonder if he is free from fact-checking because his words appear on the op-ed page. One particular paragraph in his column, "American values under Obama" (Nov. 2), left me even more confused than usual.