Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Opinion

News Opinion

The case against capital punishment

The Maryland Senate's vote today to repeal the death penalty was a milestone in an effort to remove from the law a sentence that puts vengeance above justice, fails to deter crime and provides for the families of victims not the closure they crave but instead years of frustration and heartache. With the 27-20 vote — a solid majority that included two Republicans and 25 Democrats — repeal supporters are already looking ahead to the possibility that Maryland could provide momentum for ending capital punishment in other states, and ultimately help convince the Supreme Court that the death penalty is cruel and unusual.

They shouldn't get ahead of themselves. Gay marriage advocates thought two years ago that they would easily prevail in the House of Delegates after the Senate approved marriage equality two years ago. Instead, they came up painfully short and had to wait another year. In Annapolis, nothing can be taken for granted until the votes are cast. And in this case, even that may not be the end of things. Senators removed from the bill a provision that would have appropriated a small amount of money every year to victim services. In so doing, they also removed any question about whether the legislation could be petitioned to referendum. Ultimately, voters could have the final say. The attention provided by the Senate's vote, then, offers an important opportunity to restate the case against capital punishment.

In 2009, Maryland enacted what are thought to be the nation's strictest standards for applying the death penalty. It may only be used in cases where a suspect is linked to the crime with DNA or other biological evidence; provides a voluntary, videotaped confession; or is recorded in a video that conclusively links him or her to the murder. But for all that, the possibility remains that the state could sentence an innocent person to death.

DNA evidence doesn't necessarily prove anything more than a suspect's presence at a crime scene. And it's far from unheard of for an innocent person, under duress, to confess. In 2007, The New York Times conducted an analysis of the first 200 prisoners exonerated with DNA evidence. In a quarter of those cases, the wrongfully convicted had confessed or otherwise admitted guilt, and in about 4 percent, they had actually pleaded guilty to crimes they did not commit.

Even if Maryland could somehow guarantee that it never made a mistake about someone's guilt, there remains the substantial likelihood of injustice stemming from the subjectivity with which the death penalty is applied. The preponderance of murders in Maryland involve both black victims and perpetrators, but most of those sentenced to death in this state have been black men with white victims. And the likelihood that a criminal will be sentenced to death is entirely dependent on where the crime takes place. In some Maryland jurisdictions, like Baltimore City and Prince George's County, prosecutors virtually never seek the death penalty. But for decades, former Baltimore County State's Attorney Sandra O'Connor pursued the death penalty in every case possible. Her successor, Scott Shellenberger, has dropped that policy, but his office is still responsible for a disproportionate share of the state's capital cases.

Proponents of capital punishment contend that it affords true justice for the families of murder victims. But as a practical matter, it offers years of frustration and heartache. Death is the one punishment that cannot be taken back, so the criminal justice system has no choice but to afford substantial opportunities for post-conviction review. The decades of delay in the cases of some Maryland death row inmates are unusual, but the average time from sentencing to execution nationally is nearly 15 years, according to the most recent figures from the Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Finally, and most profoundly, is the moral question. Is it right for the state to punish killing by killing? Capital punishment proponents say yes, that some people commit crimes of such profound evil that they forfeit their right to live in our society. But that can be accomplished with a sentence of life without the possibility of parole. Capital punishment serves not to render judgment on a killer's humanity but to diminish ours. It should be abolished.

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Bring back the death penalty in Md.
      Bring back the death penalty in Md.

      Baltimore's very own "Public Enemy No. 1" has been sentenced to life plus 240 years for a double murder ("Killer gets life plus 240 years, flips off top prosecutor," March 24).

    • Keep the death penalty abolished
      Keep the death penalty abolished

      I find it amazing that Del. Pat McDonough feels that reinstating the death penalty demands his time and resources as a priority in our state despite the numerous more pressing issues ("Del. McDonough seeks to restore death penalty in some cases," Jan. 26). He references two recent police killings...

    • Choose life and mercy — even for heinous crimes
      Choose life and mercy — even for heinous crimes

      While Baltimore County State's Attorney Scott Shellenberger and Towson University professor Richard Vatz have outlined many secular reasons for reinstating the death penalty ("Maryland should reinstate the death penalty," Jan. 6), I suggest that we let dead dogs lie and that we let the death penalty...

    • A death penalty rebuttal, point by point
      A death penalty rebuttal, point by point

      It was good of Baltimore County State's Attorney Scott Shellenberger and Towson University professor Richard E. Vatz to present their best arguments for reinstating the death penalty in Maryland — or anywhere else, I suppose ("Reinstate the death penalty, Maryland," Jan. 7). Let's see if any of...

    • Who says innocent people are never executed?
      Who says innocent people are never executed?

      It's ironic that your newspaper should publish a letter from our most ignorant apologists for the death penalty the same week that the Innocence Project freed yet another death row inmate from being wrongfully executed ("Maryland should reinstate the death penalty," Jan. 6).

    • Killing each other won't make us safer
      Killing each other won't make us safer

      Reading Scott Shellenberger's and Richard E. Vatz's pleas for a reinstatement of the death penalty in Maryland reminds me of a proverbial ditty my mother was fond of during my childhood ("Maryland should reinstate the death penalty," Jan. 6).

    • The death penalty is dead; let's move on
      The death penalty is dead; let's move on

      Each one of the arguments raised in Scott Shellenberger and Richard E. Vatz's recent op-ed calling for reinstating the death penalty in Maryland was considered during the debate on capital punishment ("Maryland should reinstate the death penalty," Jan. 6).

    • Lethal injections don't have to be botched [Letter]
      Lethal injections don't have to be botched [Letter]

      Having just read your latest editorial about an inmate's execution ("Another botched injection,http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/bs-ed-lethal-injection-20140725%2C0%2C1958095.story July 27), two things stand out. The first is obvious — when something like this happens, it immediately becomes...

    Comments
    Loading

    61°