Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
News Opinion

Hillary Clinton has to answer for Benghazi, too

I agree in principle with Jules Witcover's column on of Hillary Clinton's ("The rise of Hillary Clinton," Nov. 27). I think she would have been a much better president than Barack Obama.

But why no mention of the Benghazi fiasco? She may not be involved in the mis-communication, dis-communication, and lack of communication from the administration, but she should be harshly criticized for the lack of intelligent planning inherent in an ambassador going to Benghazi in the first place, not to mention with almost no security.

She has a death hanging over her head, which was not necessary but for politics.

Even though her stock is on the rise, I would never vote for someone who is so insensitive about human life.

Lyle Rescott, Marriottsville

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Benghazi suspect's capture overdue [Letter]
    Benghazi suspect's capture overdue [Letter]

    Weeks after the attack in Benghazi, American reporters interviewed Ahmed Abu Khatallah at a cafe in Libya, so why did it take our government almost two years to capture him and why now on Fathers Day ("Benghazi suspect was planning more attacks, U.S. tells U.N.," June 18)?

  • Benghazi questions unanswered
    Benghazi questions unanswered

    Was the Benghazi Coverup done because it might have affected Barack Obama's re-election chances in 2012 and Hillary Clinton's White House run in 2016? The latest report is virtually saying that no one is to blame ("Tom Schaller: The right systematically manufactures bogus news," Nov. 25).

Comments
Loading