Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99
News Opinion

Democrats strangely silent on clemency

The recent commentary by former Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr. ("Obama's unpardonable neglect of clemency," Jan. 13) was particularly interesting and pointed. In these days of concern about the death penalty, an always important topic aimed at the Democratic political base, few politicians indicate any concern for clemency. It has always been a position of risk.

I recall that Governor Ehrlich did this. In his column, he correctly points out that more Republican governors have established histories of clemency and post-conviction relief than have their Democratic colleagues. This should be an extremely important subject to everyone. The review of clemency petitions is undoubtedly not a priority for most governors, but it is a basic and important consideration for those in incarceration who have managed to transform themselves, those who have grown and matured from their earlier unlawful behavior. Clemency is indeed an extraordinary power of the governor's office and another basic example of the wonderful wisdom of our founders.

At this point, I am waiting for Governor Ehrlich's expected vicious attack from the left, but it has not come. Do they agree or disagree with his comments? Did the governor leave no earth for foxes? Perhaps those so willing to contemptuously attack a man who held concern even for those serving sentences for criminal behavior should reconsider their political judgments.

As we approach the day set aside in remembrance of a patient but passionate civil rights leader, who himself spent many hours in incarceration, we should give consideration to those undoubtedly less fortunate than ourselves who can only hope that their petition for clemency may be reviewed. And by the way, the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., who was a personal hero of my own, was a Republican.

David A. Kraus

  • Text NEWS to 70701 to get Baltimore Sun local news text alerts
  • Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
    Related Content
    • Ehrlich too negative, too partisan
      Ehrlich too negative, too partisan

      Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s cocky and aggressive partisanship make it evident why he couldn't govern effectively in Annapolis and was not re-elected for a second term ("Why Obama is viewed as weak," Nov. 30).

    • Ehrlich's delusions of grandeur
      Ehrlich's delusions of grandeur

      The Sun's front page recently carried the article, "Ehrlich entertains presidential hopes" (Dec. 3), yet it was not April 1. Surely, this was a joke. It's even more preposterous than Martin O'Malley running for president!

    • Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'
      Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'

      Though I am 1960s retread boomer and unrepentant liberal who usually disagrees commentator Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., I read his column regularly. No surprise that he recently panned Obamacare — again — but what I never hear from Republicans is the Plan B, i.e., how we deal with the...

    • Obamacare is a 'varsity stinker'
      Obamacare is a 'varsity stinker'

      OK, I can't help myself. Over the past three years, I have written at least a dozen columns critical of Obamacare (a.k.a. The "Affordable Care Act") in this space and devoted an entire chapter to the topic in my book "America: Hope for Change."

    • Hillary all over again
      Hillary all over again

      With the exception of President Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton is the most recognized American politician of this era. Today, she is far and away the Democratic front runner for president. Many believe she is the odds on favorite to win it all — a view supported by a variety of public...

    • What Obama should have said
      What Obama should have said

      Here is what President Barack Obama should have said when he addressed the American people after his party's massive losses in Tuesday's election:

    • Ehrlich mistaken on tax burden
      Ehrlich mistaken on tax burden

      Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. does not look at the big picture. Is this because he is not interested in giving a fair presentation? In his most recent column (tax bill for government at all levels.

    • Ehrlich gets the numbers wrong
      Ehrlich gets the numbers wrong

      I'm often perplexed by the content in Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s column and wonder if he is free from fact-checking because his words appear on the op-ed page. One particular paragraph in his column, "American values under Obama" (Nov. 2), left me even more confused than usual.

    Comments
    Loading