Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
News Opinion

Sun commentators are blind to conservatism's virtues

It seems Easter was a field day for attacking Dr. Ben Carson for his conservative views ("Ben Carson's biblically based conservatism," March 31.)

Columnist Dan Rodricks claimed he was not surprised by Dr. Carson's equating gays with pedophiles and people who have sex with animals. Mr. Rodricks then delved into a 2008 radio interview for more dirt to support his critique of Dr. Carson's conservatism, showing how Dr. Carson used the Bible to support such things as corporal punishment by parents and as justification of a flat tax.

Well perhaps more people need to be seeking answers in the Bible or in their faith. I don't believe that these are "antiquated beliefs," as Mr. Rodricks calls them. They are tried and true, long-standing tenets of society.

That's not to say that there can't be civil unions. But they shouldn't be put in the same category as the rite of marriage. As for corporal punishment, there are times when it is justified, as most parents would probably confess.

And maybe a flat tax isn't such a bad idea either, at least if it gets rich people to pay their fair share. Many rich people pay a smaller percentage on their income in taxes than the average taxpayer either because their income from investments is taxed at a lower rate or because they hide their money in overseas accounts.

Maybe Dr. Carson is right that the rich should not have to pay more than others, but they should at least pay the same percentage. Also, the rich should ask themselves whether they have a responsibility to give back more to society. I have a lot of respect for the philanthropy of people like Bill Gates and Warren Buffet.

I also have a lot of respect for Dr. Carson and all that he has accomplished, however. And I don't have much respect for the liberal Sun columnists like Mr. Rodricks and TV critic David Zurawik, whose journalistic skills have been carefully honed to be acceptable to a politically correct world view, and who seem anxious to tear down those who stand up for traditional values.

The fact that both Mr. Rodricks and Mr. Zurawik have a regular platform in which to express their opinions doesn't make those opinions right.

James Millford, Pasadena

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Ben Carson's conservative approach to health care reform [Letter]

    Ben Carson's conservative approach to health care reform [Letter]

    I wonder why letter writer S. R. Cohen is so quick to attack neurosurgeon Ben Carson when he seems so unaware of Mr. Carson's beliefs ("Ben Carson commits 'values malpractice,'" March 16).

  • Carson is no 'simpleton'

    Carson is no 'simpleton'

    I am a 50-something, Jesuit-educated, Libertarian-leaning registered Democrat who has been reading Thomas F. Schaller's column for years. He has the luxury of at least being accepted around liberals and only being castigated by conservatives. Libertarian thinkers eventually are attacked by both...

  • Ben Carson's own words show he's ill-suited to office

    Ben Carson's own words show he's ill-suited to office

    Thomas Schaller makes a strong case that Dr. Ben Carson should stick to medicine ("Carson should stick to medicine," Feb. 3). Mr. Schaller did not need to stray far for evidence: He cites Dr. Carson's own public pronouncements for curing the nation's ills, namely, his call for a flat tax which...

  • Carson v. Obama

    Carson v. Obama

    How can columnist Thomas F. Schaller compare Michael Jordan trying to hit a 95-mph fastball to Ben Carson being president of the United States? Is he saying a community organizer was more prepared to be president than Dr. Carson ("Ben Carson should stick to medicine," Feb. 3)?

  • Is Carson's race the problem?

    Is Carson's race the problem?

    I find it interesting that columnist Thomas F. Schaller can champion our "community organizer" president as all-knowing, intelligent and, of all things, competent, yet Ben Carson, a world-renowned brain surgeon and Herman Cain, a very successful business owner, don't have the ability to be president,...

  • Carson speaks truth

    Carson speaks truth

    Thomas F. Schaller's analogy comparing Michael Jordan's attempt to play baseball to Ben Carson's qualifications to be president is asinine ("Carson, stick to medicine," Feb. 4). Why don't we just expand that assertion to dissuade political science teachers from becoming newspaper columnists?

  • Carson should run for president

    Carson should run for president

    Columnist Thomas F. Schaller makes reference to some prominent individuals who failed to succeed in business, but he may be too young to remember that a shopkeeper named Harry S. Truman defeated a favored Republican, Thomas E. Dewey, in 1946 ("Ben Carson should stick to medicine," Feb. 3).

  • Columnist, heal thyself

    Columnist, heal thyself

    Thomas F. Schaller's piece on Ben Carson is nothing more than an ad hominem attack, an attack more appropriate to a blog from the fever swamps of the ideological left than a nationally-recognized newspaper ("Carson, stick to medicine," Feb. 4). Frank Kent has to be spinning in his grave.