Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
News Opinion

Congress irresponsible to reject balanced budget amendment

On Friday the balanced budget amendment, known as House Joint Resolution No. 2, failed to achieve the two-thirds majority it needed for passage in the House of Representatives. The amendment called for the president to present a balanced budget to Congress annually for amendment and passage by simple majority votes. Subsequent deficit spending would have been fully permissible with 3/5s majority votes in both houses. The amendment would not have applied in times of war or national emergencies.

Four Republicans saw the amendment's simple majority requirement for raising taxes as a too readily easy way of making the current consumers of government pay for the government they're consuming.

At the same time, 160 Democrats, including Rep. C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger from Maryland's 2nd District, wanted to make sure that deficit spending would remain as easy to carry out as spending that's paid for — no higher bar, no additional questions asked.

These 164 voices were enough to mute the 261 representatives (25 Democrats and 236 Republicans) who saw the amendment as the 112th Congress' last chance to show the world — and its credit rating agencies — that America does indeed care about its debt and will get its house in order.

Now their chance is gone. The 112th Congress will be rightly remembered (or forgotten, as it were) as a Congress that failed to answer the call when America's future generations asked it to protect them.

Larry Smith, Timonium

The writer, a Republican, is a candidate for Congress in Maryland's 2nd District.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Schaller fails to see danger of U.S. debt

    Columnist Thomas F. Schaller's analysis is incredibly myopic ("Avoiding Europe's austerity nightmare," April 18). To compare the economic condition of the U.S. to those of Greece or Spain at the beginning of the economic crisis is comparing apples and oranges.

  • Military spending is misplaced U.S. priority

    On April 17, I will be protesting war taxes at Baltimore's main post office. I realize that taxes fund many good programs — education, environment and diplomacy. But sadly when 57 percent of the federal budget goes to the Pentagon, the government's priorities are out of touch with the pressing...

  • A better budget remedy than the Buffett rule

    You end your editorial on the Buffett Rule ("The Buffett Rule backlash," April 13) with the question, "Where will the $50 billion come from to balance the budget, if not from this minimum tax plan?"

  • Skeptical of Buffett and need for higher taxes

    First, I'm an 80-year-old living on Social Security, and I know all the tax loopholes need to be closed ("The Buffett Rule backlash," April 13). But isn't it correct that Warren Buffett owes the IRS a great deal of taxes for a number of years? Let's have a true picture of Mr. Buffett.

  • The Buffett Rule backlash

    The Buffett Rule backlash

    Our view: Taxing the wealthy at rates others already face wouldn't solve the nation's deficit, but it would restore a modicum of fairness to the tax code

  • Godless Republicans turn back on poor and sick

    Some churchmen take exception to some of President Barack Obama's positions on matters of faith. I suggest these men of faith take a closer look at the true meaning of religion. All three Abrahamic religions — Christianity, Judaism and Islam — have as their central theme the commandments to protect...