Unlimited Access. Try it Today! Your First 10 Days Always $0.99

Opinion

News Opinion

Immigration police are arresting innocent people [Letter]

Thanks for your coverage of the ACLU's report on immigration detainers in Maryland ("ACLU criticizes Md. police on immigration enforcement," Nov. 19).

Unfortunately, the claim made by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement that immigration detainers are issued only against people ICE has a legal basis to take into custody is false.

Nationally, between 2008 and 2012 at least 834 immigration detainer requests were lodged against U.S. citizens — people who are never properly the subjects of an immigration detainer.

The Maryland data also showed that between 2010 and 2012 at least six immigration detainers targeted individuals from Puerto Rico — who of course are also U.S. citizens.

These incidents seriously undermines the claim that ICE only issues detainers against individuals it has a legal basis for detaining, and it raises critical due process concerns about immigration detainers.

Another ICE spokesperson claims that persons targeted by immigration detainers are "dangerous criminals" who would otherwise be left on the street. That claim is completely undermined by the data, which shows that in Maryland the vast majority of immigration detainers are issued against persons charged only with traffic violations or minor offenses. The same is true nationwide.

Immigration detainer requests are issued at the sole discretion of a single administrative officer, without any kind of review, and therefore they cannot substitute for a proper determination of whether someone is potentially dangerous. That's what courts and the criminal justice system are for.

State and local facilities are holding individuals who are not deportable and who should never have been detained in the first place because local law-enforcement is being diverted from community policing to do ICE's job for it.

Sirine Shebaya

The writer is an immigrants' rights attorney with the ACLU of Maryland.

-
To respond to this letter, send an email to talkback@baltimoresun.com. Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Don't finance amnesty
    Don't finance amnesty

    Funding for the federal government under the current continuing resolution runs out on Tuesday, Dec. 11 at midnight, and the Republican majority in the House of Representatives seems poised to prevent another government shut down.

  • No amnesty for undocumented immigrants
    No amnesty for undocumented immigrants

    President Obama wants to write his own laws on immigration and amnesty ("Immigrants, advocates must wait for deportation relief," Feb. 17).

  • Alexander Hamilton was undocumented
    Alexander Hamilton was undocumented

    If an orphaned 17-year-old born out of wedlock to a Scottish father and a French mother on the island of Nevis in the British West Indies arrived in New York City by ship today, would he be deported?

  • Immigration reform can wait
    Immigration reform can wait

    The Sun's recent editorial, "No lame duck president" (Nov. 16), made the editorial board look a little ridiculous.

  • Obama casts himself as a dictator with immigration action
    Obama casts himself as a dictator with immigration action

    On Thursday President Barack Obama granted amnesty to 5 million illegal aliens even though he declared it is not amnesty ("Obama makes his case for immigration action," Nov. 21). He has lost credibility with all the lies he has said in the past six years as president. What he did was unconstitutional....

  • Obama's disastrous immigration policy
    Obama's disastrous immigration policy

    The misguided immigration policies of President Barack Obama will have disastrous consequences for the nation's future ("Immigration reprieve would apply to 55,000 in Maryland," Feb. 8).

  • Immigration reform, yes, executive action, no
    Immigration reform, yes, executive action, no

    Is the looming battle over immigration really about Congress' power to legislate immigration policy or about the president's power to set policy by executive order? I think it's the latter. But what really is at stake is the ability of Congress to deal effectively with the millions of illegal immigrants...

  • Who do the Democrats think they're fooling?
    Who do the Democrats think they're fooling?

    I am disappointed but not surprised by the furor over whether to fully fund the Department of Homeland Security ("Congress OKs deal to avoid shutdown at Homeland Security," Feb. 27).

Comments
Loading

54°