Try digitalPLUS for 10 days for only $0.99

Opinion

News Opinion

Witcover: of presidential gaffes and calamities

Every American president has to weather occasional political gaffes. Whether their own or those committed by associates, they cause temporary embarrassment or pain but are ultimately survivable. Loose lips may sink ships, as was often said in warning during World War II, but they're seldom fatal in the normal course of governing.

Major mistakes, however, if they linger or are repeated, can be the undoing of a presidency. The excesses of the Vietnam War that drove Lyndon Johnson to the sidelines in 1968, and Watergate, which led to Richard Nixon's resignation in 1974, have had lasting political consequences.

In 1978, Jimmy Carter's extensive and too-visible procrastination over what to do about the nation's energy crisis led to a circus-like caravan of the nation's wise men to seemingly endless brain-picking at Camp David. The fiasco conveyed a message of presidential indecision and befuddlement that contributed to his defeat for re-election in 1980.

In 1998, the senior George Bush's Republican National Convention promise to voters, "Read my lips: no new taxes," boomeranged on him later when, under pressures from economic policy advisers, he went ahead and imposed them. Chagrined GOP conservatives, always suspecting Bush of being a closet moderate, deserted him in droves, and their outrage led to his defeat for re-election in 1992.

Unhappily for Barack Obama, a similar political peril now faces him in the confused rollout of his hard-won health-care insurance law. The problems have conveyed a sense of managerial incompetence by this president who came to office with no experience in running a bureaucracy.

As with Mr. Bush and "Read my lips," a mere verbal gaffe threatens to mushroom into a major illustration of managerial neglect if not outright deception. Obama's now-infamous promise to voters about insurance -- "If you like the plan you have, you can keep it" and "no one will take it away" -- has been rendered "inoperative," in Watergate era jargon, by insurance industry reality and the new health-care law itself.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, now reduced with considerable malice to the label of "Obamacare," provides that existing plans must include certain new protections, including coverage for pre-existing medical conditions, coverage for dependents under age 26 and other desirable provisions. Insurance companies offering plans lacking such coverage have notified clients that their plans are being cancelled. Hence the public uproar.

President Obama's failure to foresee this complication or failure to spell it out has forced him to backtrack on his earlier categorical assurances, adding fuel to any already combustible failure in the rollout of the whole program. Much depends now on whether and how quickly the technological enrollment snarl can be untangled, allowing the many millions of uninsured Americans to buy into the embattled plan.

What may have been dismissed initially as a mere bureaucratic gaffe or a presidential slip of the tongue now risks developing into a major invitation to re-evaluate the public judgment of the man elected to the Oval Office in 2008 and re-elected in 2012 as a competent steward of the nation's business.

The kink in the Affordable Care Act may yet be ironed out, and the law may yet take its place among the other great social welfare programs. Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid also experienced early growing pains before blossoming into widely cherished components in the America social safety net. But the jury distinctly is still out on Mr. Obama's health care law, and the fate of his entire presidency may hang in the balance.

Not every heavy cloud over an occupant of the White House has proved to be politically fatal. Bill Clinton, impeached for lying to a grand jury in the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal of the 1990s, was acquitted by the Senate in a partisan vote and finished his second term with high marks for his governance, if not for his personal behavior.

Barack Obama bears no similar personal scar, although his popularity has already taken a considerable hit in the polls. But if the trials of Obamacare continue to throw the rest of his agenda off track in his three remaining presidential years, he will have paid a high price for its bureaucratic difficulties and vulnerabilities.

Jules Witcover is a syndicated columnist and former long-time writer for The Baltimore Sun. His latest book is "Joe Biden: A Life of Trial and Redemption" (William Morrow). His email is juleswitcover@comcast.net.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • An incomplete report on payments to doctors from drug companies [Letter]

    It actually doesn't do much good to head up an article about payments to doctors by telling readers that a doctor invented a great new device and the company sent him a check for royalties ("Payments to doctors from drug companies, device makers revealed," Oct. 4).

  • Health exchange still a hassle

    Health exchange still a hassle

    I found The Sun's editorial, "Beyond the website" (Nov. 23), about how well the new-and-improved Maryland Health Connection had launched to be ironic and not in a good way. Perhaps you should have looked beyond the health insurance website itself to see if the system really had been improved from...

  • Gruber and his liberal lies

    Gruber and his liberal lies

    Nice coverage of the Jonathan Gruber hearing which amounted to, I think, about 60 words ("Obamacare adviser sorry for comments," Dec. 10). He appeared to spend most of the time denying, lying and obfuscating — true traits of liberals these days.

  • Md. lawmakers can help those with chronic conditions

    Md. lawmakers can help those with chronic conditions

    On behalf of Marylanders with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PI), the Immune Deficiency Foundation (IDF) applauds the MedChi CEO Gene Ransom for standing up to insurance companies looking to take advantage of our state's Health Benefits Exchange patients ("The high cost of health care reform,"...

  • Why has The Sun neglected the Jonathan Gruber scandal?

    Why has The Sun neglected the Jonathan Gruber scandal?

    Your systematic neglect of the horrendous Jonathan Gruber/Obamacare scandal is undoubtedly attributable to your partisan bias ("Gruber flap reopens not-so-old wounds," Dec. 1).

  • Unaffordable care in Bel Air

    Unaffordable care in Bel Air

    I am 59 years old, have been a practicing family physician for 30 years and I can't wait to pay my new health care premium for 2015. This past year, I paid $680 a month for my wife and me with a $5,400 deductible. With the Affordable Care Act, in 2015, I will be paying $700 a month with a $12,000...

  • CareFirst's surprise birthday gift

    CareFirst's surprise birthday gift

    I got an unexpected present after turning 70 in December — a 35 percent premium increase on my Medigap insurance from CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield.

  • Obamacare's big day

    Obamacare's big day

    It received surprisingly little fanfare, but last week three states demonstrated how to "fix" the Affordable Care Act, should the Supreme Court rule adversely against a key provision within it. Arkansas, Pennsylvania and Delaware all received permission to set up state health insurance exchanges...

Comments
Loading

72°