Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
NewsOpinion

Why Republicans want to tax students and not polluters

A basic economic principle is that government ought to tax what we want to discourage, and not tax what we want to encourage.

For example, if we want less carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, we should tax carbon polluters. On the other hand, if we want more students from lower-income families to be able to afford college, we should not put a tax on student loans.

Sounds pretty simple, doesn't it? Unfortunately, congressional Republicans seem intent on doing exactly the opposite.

Earlier this year, the Republican-led House passed a bill pegging student-loan interest rates to the yield on the 10-year Treasury note, plus 2.5 percentage points. "I have very little tolerance for people who tell me that they graduate with $200,000 of debt or even $80,000 of debt, because there's no reason for that," said Rep. Virginia Foxx, Republican of North Carolina and the co-sponsor of the GOP bill.

Republicans estimate this would bring in around $3.7 billion of extra revenue over a 10-year period, which would help pay down the federal debt.

In other words, it's a tax -- and one that hits lower-income students and their families hardest. Which is why several leading Democrats, including Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, oppose it. "Let's make sure we don't charge so much in interest that the students are actually paying a tax to reduce the deficit," Mr. Durbin argues.

Republicans claim the president's plan is almost the same as their own. Not true. President Barack Obama's plan would lead to lower rates, limit repayments to 10 percent of a borrower's discretionary income, and fix the rate for the life of the loan.

Meanwhile, a growing number of Republicans have signed a pledge -- sponsored by the multibillionaire Koch brothers' political organization, Americans for Prosperity -- to oppose any climate-change legislation that might raise government revenues by taxing polluters.

It is officially known as the "No Climate Tax Pledge," and its signers promise to "oppose any legislation relating to climate change that includes a net increase in government revenue."

At least 411 current officeholders nationwide have signed on, including the entire GOP House leadership, a third of the members of the House as a whole, and a quarter of U.S. senators.

The New Yorker's Jane Mayer reports that two successive efforts to control greenhouse-gas emissions by implementing cap-and-trade energy bills have died in the Senate, the latter specifically targeted by Americans for Prosperity.

Why are Republicans willing to impose a tax on students and not on polluters? Don't look for high principle.

Big private banks stand to make a bundle on student loans if rates on government loans are raised. They have thrown their money at both parties but have been particularly generous to the GOP. A 2012 report by the nonpartisan Public Campaign shows that since 2000, the student loan industry has spent more than $50 million on lobbying.

Meanwhile, the Koch brothers -- whose Koch Industries ranks among America's worst air polluters, according to Forbes Magazine -- have long been intent on blocking a carbon tax or a cap-and-trade system, which would cut into their profits. And they, too, have been donating generously to Republicans to do their bidding.

We should be taxing polluters and not taxing students. The GOP has it backwards because its patrons want it that way.

Robert Reich, former U.S. Secretary of Labor, is professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley and the author of "Beyond Outrage," now available in paperback. He blogs at www.robertreich.org.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Why are Americans so angry and divided?
    Why are Americans so angry and divided?

    It's no coincidence that we are experiencing both polarization and income inequality not seen since the 1920s

  • No more excuses on hazing
    No more excuses on hazing

    You would be hard-pressed to find anyone in authority at any Maryland college or university who is not opposed to fraternity or sorority hazing. Yet when push comes to shove — or ice water bath or gross-out eating contest or binge drinking — such incidents tend to get nothing more...

  • It's time to kill the lame duck session
    It's time to kill the lame duck session

    The current lame duck session of Congress, which ends on Jan. 3 and includes senators and representatives defeated on Nov. 4, began with the same old partisanship that characterized the last few years in Washington, as the Senate rejected the Keystone XL pipeline construction bill by a single...

  • Protecting and serving U.S. immigrants
    Protecting and serving U.S. immigrants

    The most interesting question about President Barack Obama's action on immigration is not its legality. Presidents from Eisenhower forward, Republicans and Democrats alike, have used their executive authority to legalize immigrants in large and small measures, and their actions roused little...

  • Don't fall for tobacco industry e-cigarette smokescreen
    Don't fall for tobacco industry e-cigarette smokescreen

    No one should have to choose between their health and a paycheck. Which is why, with all that is still unknown about the dangers of e-cigarette use, we must put public health first and prohibit the use of these unregulated products in all workplaces, including restaurants, bars and casinos....

  • Black Friday shopping [Poll]
    Black Friday shopping [Poll]
  • We will retaliate!
  • The BMA turns 100
    The BMA turns 100

    The Baltimore Museum of Art owes its existence to the work of civic-minded citizens a century ago who believed that a great city was incomplete without a great art museum. And from the beginning their vision of the purpose of a great museum was to provide a place for people of every station...

Comments
Loading