Get unlimited digital access to baltimoresun.com. $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News Opinion

Romney's surprising post-mortem

After three months of licking the wounds of his defeat, Mitt Romney surfaced this week on Fox News with a somewhat unexpected rationale for his disappointing election outcome. What cost him the White House, he seemed to say, was what he loved to call and still calls "Obamacare."

Throughout the campaign, Mr. Romney hammered away at President Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act. He depicted it as a hugely unpopular power grab that he would "repeal and replace" when he got to the Oval Office, with the grateful relief and support of the American public.

But when asked Sunday why he had lost, here's what Mr. Romney said: "It's a proven political strategy, which is you have a bunch of money from the government to a group and, guess what, they'll vote for you. ... The president had the power of incumbency. Obamacare was very attractive, particularly to those without health insurance. And they came out in large numbers to vote" for his opponent.

It sounded as if Mr. Romney, his chief political advisers and the bulk of the Republican Party had based much of their campaign on opposition to a program in the belief this would be their ticket to the presidency. And that they had sorely misread the sentiment in the country at large about it.

Mr. Romney suggested that the health care law was the decisive political issue for minority voters who in the end brought him down. "The weakness that our campaign had and I had," he said, "is we weren't effective in taking our message primarily to minority voters, to Hispanic Americans, African-Americans, other minorities. We did very well with the majority population but not with minority populations," which voted overwhelmingly for Mr. Obama.

These observations inevitably recycled Mr. Romney's campaign comment to a closed meeting of donors that the "47 percent" of Americans "are dependent upon government ... believe they are victims ... believe that government has a responsibility to care for them," and thus would never vote for the GOP nominee.

Mr. Romney candidly acknowledges now that "it was a very unfortunate remark that I made. It's not what I meant. I didn't express myself as I wished I would have. You know, when you speak in private, you don't spend as much time thinking about how something could be twisted, distorted and it could come out wrong and be used. But I did [say it], and it was very harmful. What I said is not what I believe. ... My whole life has been devoted to helping people, all of the people."

Mr. Romney's implication that the 47 percent comment had been "twisted and distorted" belied the fact that the remark was recorded and videotaped for all the country to see and hear.

Earlier in the same interview, Mr. Romney's wife, Ann, acknowledged that she and one of her sons were frustrated that their own campaign resisted family urgings that more of the nominee's personal life be made public. But she argued that the election loss "was not just the campaign's fault."

She went on: "I believe it was the media's fault as well, that he was not being given a fair shake, that people weren't really allowed to see him for who he was." She said she was "happy to blame the media," that "our side believe that there is more bias in favor of the other side," and that "I think that is a universal, pretty universally felt opinion."

At the same time, Ann Romney confessed that while "we certainly had the passion coming from our side ... I don't think we were as aware of the passion that was coming from the other side," and that "we were a little blindsided by that."

And when asked by Fox anchor Chris Wallace about the image that "you were so wealthy that you were somehow out of touch with the concerns of the average American," she inartfully replied: "That's a reality, you know, you can't change. I mean, we are who we are."

Yes, but it might have helped had her husband been a bit more attuned to, and articulate about, how the other half lives.

Jules Witcover, a syndicated columnist, is a former longtime writer for The Baltimore Sun. His latest book is "Joe Biden: A Life of Trial and Redemption" (William Morrow). You can respond to this column at juleswitcover@comcast.net.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Out of the White House and onto the dole
    Out of the White House and onto the dole

    Why are we paying millions in pensions and expenses for our ex-presidents?

  • Snow falls, climate changes
    Snow falls, climate changes

    For those who have found the cold, snowy winter of 2014-2015 more than mildly irritating and the words, "be grateful you don't live in Boston" insufficiently comforting, today's snowfall may have pushed you over the edge. Not only because it shut down schools, governments and businesses and...

  • From now on, she walks to school
    From now on, she walks to school

    Since there have been parents and kids, each generation has struggled to understand the other. To me, it appears that children today are much less accountable and have fewer responsibilities than I did growing up. One of our kids is an over-achieving, motivated 17-year-old girl. All of her...

  • Reject the proposed merger of Exelon and Pepco
    Reject the proposed merger of Exelon and Pepco

    Since 2008, University Park Community Solar LLC has attempted to make community solar more feasible for other Marylanders, through the organizing and building of one of the first community solar projects in the nation and through our efforts to provide information and free technical...

  • Absurdity at the heart of the latest Obamacare challenge
    Absurdity at the heart of the latest Obamacare challenge

    The determined opponents of the Affordable Care Act lost their legal fight on the merits three years ago when the Supreme Court ruled that one of its central provisions — the requirement that most individuals buy health insurance or pay a penalty — was constitutional. Now they're...

  • Ending judicial elections
    Ending judicial elections

    Electing judges by popular vote is a bad idea. Experience has taught this lesson over and over again. If you want judges to be impartial and fair (or at least appear to be), you don't force them to act like politicians making promises and seeking campaign contributions from the very people...

  • Injustice is resilient, but so are defenders of freedom
    Injustice is resilient, but so are defenders of freedom

    First, they sang "God Will Take Care of You."

  • Releasing body camera recordings [Poll]
    Releasing body camera recordings [Poll]
Comments
Loading