O'Malley denounces rumors
Mayor, his wife say they are victims of 'orchestrated' effort by Ehrlich aide; Governor considers inquiry into affair gossip
Baltimore Mayor Martin O'Malley and his wife, Catherine, today walk outside City Hall, where the couple denounced rumors of infidelity spread by an aide to Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. (Sun photo by Christopher T. Assaf / February 9, 2005)
- 1982: Worked for National Conservative Political Action Committee.
- 1985: Worked on unsuccessful lieutenant governor's campaign of Richard Viguerie, a conservative, in Va.
- 1992: Ran to become Republican delegate to national convention. Would have represented Pat Buchanan.
- 1995-2003: Worked in Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s 2nd District congressional office in Lutherville. Was district representative/legislative assistant, paid $46,600 a year.
- Jan. 15, 2003: Appointed as an executive aide in the governor's office. State officials said he never officially worked for either the Human Resources or Juvenile Services department but could have been detailed to those agencies.
- June 2, 2004: Moved to Maryland Insurance Administration. Earned $72,453 as director of communications.
See more stories »
Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., saying he was "angry" about the actions of Joseph F. Steffen Jr., said he would consider asking the state prosecutor to look into his longtime campaign and congressional aide, who resigned Tuesday because of his postings about O'Malley on a Web site.
Insurance Commissioner Alfred W. Redmer Jr., for whom Steffen worked, said someone within his agency would investigate whether Steffen used his state computer and work hours to post the messages.
Redmer also called O'Malley and the mayor's father-in-law, Maryland Attorney General J. Joseph Curran Jr., to apologize yesterday for Steffen's actions.
"These are despicable lies. These are falsehoods," said O'Malley, a Democrat who is expected to run for governor next year. "I have always been faithful to my wife, from our first date until this date."
Ehrlich insisted that Steffen is a rogue state employee - not part of any kind of orchestrated GOP effort. He called on Steffen to tell O'Malley he is sorry.
Steffen appeared anything but contrite in messages posted on www.FreeRepublic.com late Tuesday, hours after his firing.
"Hell, this might even burnish my reputation," read one posting from him on the Web site that included the rumors about the mayor.
For the past 18 months, stories have swirled in Maryland political circles and on Internet chat sites claiming that O'Malley had engaged in an extramarital affair.
The rumors had not been reported in the mainstream media until the governor's office made Steffen's firing public late Tuesday. Steffen's dismissal came as The Washington Post was preparing to publish a story linking him to some of the postings.
But because the rumors were widely known, they have been considered a political liability for the mayor.
Some political observers say the rumors could work to O'Malley's advantage if voters believe Ehrlich had a hand in spreading them - something the governor has denied.
Speaking before a swarm of television cameras and reporters outside City Hall yesterday morning, the O'Malleys said they were victims of a political smear campaign.
"When we first started hearing these rumors back about a year and a half ago, we figured it was a falsehood that would blow through," O'Malley said. "It became pretty apparent that this was something sustained, something orchestrated, something relentless, and something that others were working very hard to make sure would not go away."
Katie Curran O'Malley - a city District Court judge - appeared to be on the verge of tears at times, simply nodding her head when her husband, before addressing reporters, turned to her and asked, "OK?"
"I've always sort of considered myself a strong woman and a tough person, but I have to tell you from the bottom of my heart, this has been one of the most difficult things I've had to endure," she said.
Katie O'Malley said the rumors had taken a toll on the couple and three of their four children. The youngest, at 2 years old, isn't old enough to understand, she said. But their 13- and 14-year-old girls have been affected.
So has their 7-year-old son, William, she said, recalling what happened when he brought home his report card for a parent's signature last week. Only one parent had to sign, but William insisted that they both do, she said.
"He said to me, 'If Daddy doesn't sign it, then they're going to think that we're in a divorce,'" she said. "And I just looked at him and my heart broke that this poor, 7-year-old kid has to worry about these lies."