Summer Sale Extended! Get unlimited digital access for 13 weeks for $13.
Harford County
News Maryland Harford County

Harford Dems won't appeal redistricting, look to charter change

Harford County Democrats have decided not to appeal a court decision and will remain shut out of the process that sets council district lines for the next decade. Instead, they are looking to a broad review of the county charter to help protect their party's interests in the future.

Democrats, who once dominated Harford, officially became the minority party last year. The party didn't field candidates in several Republican strongholds, and saw their share of the 2010 vote dip below 15 percent — the minimum eligibility standard for participation on the council redistricting commission.

The party still has more than 40 percent of registered voters, but was officially ineligible to join the process that will set boundaries for the six council seats for the next decade.

They protested at council meetings and filed a suit in Circuit Court. They lost in both attempts But the Republican-controlled County Council has appointed a bipartisan charter review board to amend Harford's charter to ensure equal representation in future redistricting efforts, and Democrats are counting the move as a victory.

"This review board will look at all the issues and the language that led us to file a court case," said Wendy Sawyer, chairwoman of the Harford County Democratic Central Committee. "We are sure they will do a thorough job, look at everything and facilitate a change. There are lots of ways to win in a bipartisan manner and that is what we have done."

The review will look at a charter provision, written originally to limit the influence of small, single-issue parties on redistricting. Council members from both parties acknowledged that the exclusion of Democrats was due to a quirk in county law but contended they had few options in shaping the redistricting committee. Democrats asked the court to block any plan submitted by the redistricting commission, but a judge ruled in July that the courts could not rewrite county law.

"The judge was bound by county law," said Councilman Dion Guthrie, one of two Democrats on the seven-member council. "The charter review board will look at this now. It's a much better option."

The judge offered to expedite an appeal, but Democrats ultimately declined, Sawyer said.

"It would have taken too long to get to court," she said. "The redistricting commission was already into the process and an appeal would have held everything up. An appeal would not be in the best interests of Harford voters."

In fact, the three-member commission has made its recommendations, well ahead of the Oct. 1 deadline, Guthrie said.

"It is an equitable guideline that we will have to tweak," he said.

Republican Councilman James V. McMahan said he can recall years when his party felt left out of the process.

"If it takes a charter review to address this issue, then let's do it with all fairness and transparency," McMahan said. "This is something we have to do in all fairness to all citizens of Harford."

mary.gail.hare@baltsun.com

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • Supreme Court sides with the people, not the politicians

    Supreme Court sides with the people, not the politicians

    Today the Supreme Court reinforced the principle that the voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around, in upholding an Arizona law that puts the task of drawing congressional district boundaries in the hands of an independent commission rather than the legislature. Maryland,...

  • Partisan redistricting undermines representative democracy [Letter]

    Partisan redistricting undermines representative democracy [Letter]

    I read with interest the recent article "Carroll conservatives clash with Van Hollen" (Nov. 12). I could readily relate to Carroll County Republican Bill Schroeder's statement — "We have nothing in common with Montgomery County — absolutely nothing" — concerning his representative, Chris Van Hollen,...

  • Redistricting reform matters to middle class families

    Redistricting reform matters to middle class families

    As one who successfully challenged Gov. Parris N. Glendening's blatantly political legislative redistricting plan in court in 2002 and the following year introduced legislation to create a gubernatorial task force to reform our redistricting process, I was pleased to see that Gov. Larry Hogan has...

  • Redistricting reform: Hogan makes good on his promise

    Redistricting reform: Hogan makes good on his promise

    Gov. Larry Hogan took an important step toward fulfilling one of the most important promises of his campaign today by naming a commission to come up with recommendations to reform the process by which Maryland redraws congressional and legislative district maps. Granted, he made a lot of important...

  • Why should redistricting be so complicated?

    Why should redistricting be so complicated?

    Surely by virtue of the U.S. Postal Service and/or past census data we much know the population of every ZIP code in the country. (If not, we could probably buy it from Amazon or UPS). So why not just go from east to west, or west to east, one ZIP code at a time until the proper population for...

  • Hogan's right about one thing: Md. district lines are ridiculous

    Hogan's right about one thing: Md. district lines are ridiculous

    Gov. Larry Hogan's proposal for a commission approach to redistricting is the best thing I've heard coming out of the governor's office since he took office ("Hogan: Redraw district lines," Aug. 7). I wish our politicians would be more interested in being public servants and less concerned about...

  • Straddling the city-county divide

    Straddling the city-county divide

    In a recent editorial you noted that Lt. Gov. Anthony G. Brown, who lives in Prince George's County, followed the traditional formula of appealing to the Baltimore region by choosing Howard County Executive Ken Ulman as his running mate ("Twin controversies for Gansler," Oct. 14).

  • The business case for redistricting reform

    The business case for redistricting reform

    Our view: Sure, CEOs want lower taxes, but they're also interested in good government

Comments
Loading
86°