- previous
- 1
- 2
- | single page
"We acknowledge that the incident occurred," Carter said, adding the bartender was "too busy watching a Ravens game" and didn't pay enough attention to the regulations.
The bartender, she continued, had training on the county and state's liquor laws and all servers are told to card anyone who looks younger than 40. In addition, there are daily shift meetings during which employees are reminded of this rule.
"We're doing a 100 percent, zero tolerance policy," Carter said, and the bartender was fired.
To prevent future violations, the business has adopted new policies, including a daily sign-in sheet that requires employees to read the state law and corporation rules and then sign their names to acknowledge they have read this and if they violate the rules they will be fired.
There will also be an incentive program that will reward employees with a $500 bonus when they successfully pass a compliance test.
Open Door Café
Licensees Robert Glock and Richard Bearch agreed to Robbins' statement that the server did not request identification from the underage employee during a compliance test.
The restaurant has had its license since 2006, Bearch said, and has "taken it very seriously."
Open Door Café has changed its policy on carding people who look younger than 40 years old to a "100 percent carding rule." Because of this, Bearch continued, some patrons have been insulted and the restaurant has lost business. The server was also disciplined.
Olive Tree
The Aberdeen restaurant was the only establishment not to appear before the board for serving alcohol to a minor.
The charge, instead, was failing to have the resident licensee on the premises the required amount of time between January and September and failing to cooperate with the board.
Melvin Kodenski, who represented the restaurant, told the board that Olive Tree's resident licensee, Kalliopi Hapsis, has dealt with serious health issues all her life, including being diagnosed with cancer this year and having two surgeries in the last three months.
Vice chair Sandi Tunney asked Robbins how many times he had visited the establishment during that period to see if Hapsis was there.
Robbins wasn't sure of the exact number of times, but rattled off several days in September, January, June, March and July — at least a dozen dates, he said. To his knowledge, there had been no attempts to correct the problem.
Inspector Danielle Markette also visited the restaurant numerous times and gave verbal warnings on more than one occasion.
Kodenski suggested to the board that Hapsis submit a schedule of times she would be at the restaurant so Robbins or Markette could visit when she said she would be there.
"It wasn't like she was ignoring the situation," Kodenski said. As for cooperating with the board, "it was more because of the health issues than anything else."
"We are here to work with the licensees," Hess said, and would have worked with the business to avoid getting to the point of violation.
Administrator Kathryn Thess informed the board that they have worked with the business to correct the issues and was promised a schedule in July, which they never received.
"The board has tried to help out," she said.


