Councilwoman Cathy Bevins

Councilwoman Cathy Bevins has sponsored a resolution opposing the $13.7 million project in Rosedale by Homes for America, an Annapolis-based nonprofit that builds affordable housing. (Baltimore Sun / October 26, 2010)

The Baltimore County Council is poised to block a low-income housing project planned in Rosedale by turning down state funding, citing fears the development would lead to increased crime and crowd the local elementary school.

The move comes a month after another developer dropped plans to build an affordable-housing project in White Marsh that also faced strong community opposition.

Housing advocates say resistance to such projects could exacerbate a worrisome shortage of homes for low-income residents in the county.

The Rev. Joseph Sanders, president of the nonprofit Baltimore County Communities for the Homeless, called the Rosedale proposal to build homes for residents who earn less than 60 percent of the county's median income "commendable" and efforts to block it "disturbing."

"We know that homelessness and hunger and poverty are not just a city issue, they're a county issue," Sanders said. "And it's growing in numbers on a daily basis because of the economy, because of our culture."

Councilwoman Cathy Bevins has sponsored a resolution opposing the $13.7 million project in Rosedale by Homes for America, an Annapolis-based nonprofit that builds affordable housing. The Middle River Democrat, whose district includes the proposed site, said the development would further concentrate poor people in one area.

A vote on Bevins' resolution is set for Monday.

Homes for America has proposed the 50-unit Homes at McCormick development at 5501 McCormick Ave. and is seeking more than $1 million in public financing from the state for the project. If the council approves the resolution, the state will not finance the development.

If passed, it would be the first time a county has used a resolution to block state financing for an affordable-housing project.

The state recently changed the way local governments weigh in on such projects, in hopes of easing the process. Before, local governments had to approve state financing for each project; now the financing goes through unless counties issue a resolution of disapproval.

At a council meeting last week, Bevins told colleagues that the neighborhood wasn't right for such a project, pointing out that residents there don't have access to public transportation. She also said residents are overwhelmingly against the idea.

"I'm not anti-poor people, because God knows I've been poor," Bevins said after the meeting. "It has to do with the location."

She also said the area is "already a very poor community."

The development, to be built on a grassy, 10-acre site in a neighborhood of single-family houses, would include 45 townhomes and five single-family homes. Residents would be able to purchase the homes after 15 years under a lease-to-purchase arrangement.

"We're attracting people who want to buy a home," Homes for America president Nancy Rase told the County Council.

At least five units would be reserved for Section 8 renters, who receive housing vouchers under a government program for the poor. Residents spend an average of seven years on Baltimore County's Section 8 waiting list to receive vouchers, according to the county housing office.

Last year, County Executive Kevin Kamenetz's administration expressed support for the development. His chief of staff, Don Mohler, declined to comment on the resolution, noting it doesn't require the county executive's approval.

"As a matter of policy, County Executive Kamenetz is very supportive of creating additional workforce housing opportunities in Baltimore County," Mohler said in an email.

In a letter last year to Pax-Edwards LLC, which is Homes for America's partner on the project, Kamenetz said the county "strongly supports" the developers' application for state funding. He also said the county was willing to provide a financing package that included a $1 million loan.

The council is likely to adopt Bevins' resolution, Chairman Tom Quirk said, citing a long-standing tradition of deference on development matters to the council member whose district is involved.