Baltimore City said Tuesday that it will throw out more than 6,000 speed and red-light camera tickets because its former contractor has stopped showing up in court to defend them — the latest sign of the dysfunction dogging Baltimore's speed camera program.
City transportation officials say they lack the evidence to fight the appeals on their own. Voiding the tickets means the city is forgoing the chance to collect more than $300,000 in fines.
The announcement comes after judges over the past two weeks dismissed 600 speed camera tickets because city lawyers said they had no evidence.
"It's like amnesty day or something," District Judge Catherine C. O'Malley told motorists in her courtroom Friday before dismissing all their tickets.
City officials and the contractor, Xerox State and Local Solutions, are pointing the finger at each other, with the city saying that Xerox has not provided the necessary information and Xerox insisting that it has given the city all the data it needs to mount a defense in court.
Word of the wholesale dismissals comes days after the city stopped issuing any tickets from its troubled speed and red-light camera program. Officials shut the program down after acknowledging that they would have to void more than 500 tickets because of a programming glitch with one of the cameras supplied by the city's new vendor, Brekford Corp.
Meanwhile, city solicitor George Nilson revealed Tuesday that the city and Xerox are also locked in a financial dispute. Nilson wouldn't give details but said the company claims it is owed "a significant amount" of money by the city. A Xerox spokesman declined to comment on the dispute.
The 600 citations dismissed in court this month include ones issued in August and September. Xerox managed the city's speed and red-light camera system through Dec. 31, and drivers who appealed tickets issued last fall haven't had hearings yet at the Wabash Avenue courthouse.
"There are over 4,000 speed and 2,000 red light citations awaiting trial, so letters will be issued to those motorists stating that their tickets will be voided," Department of Transportation spokeswoman Adrienne Barnes said in an e-mail Tuesday. Speed camera ticket fines are $40, while red light ticket fines are $75.
Last Friday, O'Malley dismissed all 200 speed camera tickets on her docket.
"Everybody is going to be very happy," she told motorists gathered in court, prepared to appeal their tickets. "They don't have any evidence for any of these speed camera tickets."
"No evidence?" O'Malley asked, turning to Liz Martinez, an assistant city solicitor.
"No evidence, your honor," Martinez replied.
A member of a task force appointed by Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake to study the city's camera enforcement program praised the city's intention to notify motorists the tickets will be thrown out so they don't need to travel to court. But she expressed concern about the city's inability to present evidence.
"If the city is unable to move forward with a case absent information from a vendor, I think it raises the question of who is actually overseeing or running that program," said Ragina Averella, public and government affairs manager at AAA Mid-Atlantic.
Asked why the city claimed it lacked evidence, Nilson, the city's top lawyer, said, "Essentially the city needs access to information that has been in the possession of and brought forward by Xerox. They're no longer available to bring that information forward. If you want to find out why that is so, ask Xerox."
Xerox says it has given the city all necessary information to defend the tickets. "The city has been provided the data they need in order to bring evidence to court," company spokesman Carl Langenkamp said in a statement to The Sun. Until recently, a company official would use a laptop computer to present photos and in many cases video clips to support a speeding allegation.
Although Xerox's contract ended Dec. 31, the company assisted the city for more than 90 days "to facilitate a smooth transition," Langenkamp said. Xerox offered to enter into a contract with the city for transition services, he said, but was unable to reach agreement.
Langenkamp said the city had ample time to prepare to handle these appeal cases itself. "We notified the city and the court system multiple times and well in advance that our [court] representation would end on April 8."
Nilson offered a different version of events. He said that the city tried to "fashion an agreement" to keep Xerox going to court until all pending appeals were exhausted, but that company officials "were non-responsive."