When Baltimore City Councilwoman Mary Pat Clarke visited Abbottston Elementary after news broke that the school had cheated on state testing for students in 2009, she despaired because she never believed Principal Angela Faltz, whom she had known for decades, could cheat her children or her community.
"But there was nothing to be done about it at the time," Clarke recalled in an interview Friday. "I was able to give Dr. Faltz a hug, and then we never saw her again."
According to documents obtained by The Baltimore Sun this week, independent hearing officers — attorneys hired by the system to render facts and findings in personnel hearings — found the school system's investigation, triggered by plunging student test scores, to be fundamentally flawed.
"While there is a healthy dose of speculation, suggestion and suspicion that cheating occurred in 2009, there is a lack of credible evidence that cheating actually occurred," one hearing officer wrote. "Not one witness was able to testify with certainty that they knew what happened in Abbottston. To the contrary, witness after witness stated that they did not know what happened at Abbottston."
The hearing officers also said city schools CEO Andrés Alonso knew there were problems with a state analysis of eraser markings in test books but moved ahead anyway to dismiss the principals last year.
The findings also raise questions about how the system determines whether a school cheated and who is responsible.
This was not the first time a city principal has been removed for irregular test results despite a lack of evidence about who was responsible for the cheating, according to a former investigator for the school system.
Jose Rosado, who left the system last June after three years, investigated the case of George Washington Elementary in 2010, the year that Alonso announced he had revoked the professional license of its principal, Susan Burgess.
The school, which had earned a Blue Ribbon award for its achievement, was confirmed to have cheated by a state investigation. In an interview, Burgess denied that she was responsible for the thousands of erasure marks the state found on tests.
Alonso said at the time that if she didn't know cheating had occurred, she should have — a standard he would continue to uphold for principals. Burgess did not fight the system's decision.
Rosado said Burgess acknowledged being in the testing rooms, which is not a breach of protocol. After several interviews with staff members, Rosado said, he informed the system that there was no evidence to suggest that Burgess knew of or did anything wrong.
"There was no evidence that pointed to her," Rosado recalled in a recent interview. "Just seeing that woman in there, and the erasure analysis, they got rid of her. The erasing could have been done in a classroom. As little evidence as they had on her, they made an example of that poor woman."
Hundreds of documents associated with the case of Faltz and Isaac illustrated how key players in the city and state's initial investigation stopped short of reaching any conclusions about whether cheating had occurred when scores dropped drastically in 2010. The officials also reserved judgment about who or what played a part in the declines.
Still, Alonso was not convinced that cheating hadn't occurred. He maintained that position even though interviews conducted with 26 school employees by his internal investigator found that no staff member had witnessed test tampering.
School system officials argued that the school's benchmark scores — which are used to predict how students will perform on the Maryland School Assessment — were so different from the MSA results that the principals should have known something wasn't right. Moreover, other schools that had similar obstacles, such as high student turnover, didn't experience the same test score drops.
Alonso declined to comment Friday. The school system does not comment on personnel hearings.
But according to his testimony before the hearing officers, Alonso "agrees that benchmark testing ... does not in itself, prove there was cheating," according to the report. The report adds that he gave interviews with the 26 school employees "their proper weight, particularly given that the same kinds of statements were made about another school where it was ultimately determined that cheating had occurred."
The most troubling aspect of the school system investigation, according to the hearing officers, was that the system built its case on a faulty erasure analysis. In his announcement that Abbottston had cheated last year, Alonso said the analysis showed patterns of erasures from wrong to right answers "beyond the realm of probability."