Baltimore elected officials said Friday they were outraged by an inspector general's report that found the Mayor's Office of Information Technology and a former deputy mayor withheld information from and misled city officials about a controversial project to install nearly $675,000 in phone and computer equipment.
"I am extremely concerned if it happens to be the case that the administration is engaged in misleading top city officials," said Councilwoman Mary Pat Clarke. "If it proves to be the case, I will say that I am deeply concerned about this approach to government and to life.
"This is the heart of governance here," she added.
The city's inspector general detailed a number of problems surrounding efforts by the mayor's technology office to upgrade the city's phone system. The report documented emails written by former Deputy Mayor Christopher Thomaskutty and former Chief Information Officer Rico J. Singleton in which they discussed withholding information on the project — in one instance denying its existence to City Council President Bernard C. "Jack" Young.
The report also found possible conflicts of interest and missed opportunities for "significant cost savings." Inspector General David N. McClintock looked into purchases made by Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake's technology office after Comptroller Joan M. Pratt, whose office had initiated a similar undertaking, accused the administration of breaking procurement rules and wasting taxpayers' money.
McClintock said in an interview that he did not find any illegal actions but that he would continue to investigate the mayor's technology office. He said that the problems outlined in the report were "contained to the mayor's office of information technology" and that he hoped city officials would learn from the report and improve practices.
"No government is perfect. There's always room for improvement," McClintock said.
The mayor's office has denied Pratt's claims and disputed parts of the inspector general's report. The administration also outlined several steps it has taken to tighten controls over procurement and to prevent conflicts of interest.
Thomaskutty, who has since left the administration, was referred to only as "deputy mayor" in the inspector general's report, and his name was redacted from emails. But City Council members, administration officials and the comptroller identified him in interviews.
Young believes that Thomaskutty "misled" him about the status of the project, according to Young's spokesman Lester Davis. "He's extremely disappointed," Davis said.
But Davis said Thomaskutty called Young on Friday and indicated that he believed he was misrepresented in the report. Young "still believes 90 percent of his interactions with Thomaskutty were aboveboard," Davis said.
Thomaskutty did not respond to requests for comment.
The emails contained in McClintock's report depict administrators in the mayor's technology office intent on overhauling the city's phone system — traditionally controlled by the city's comptroller — and eager to keep others from knowing about their actions.
"This is extremely bad for the city," Singleton wrote in one email about Pratt's office requesting bids for a new phone system. "I need you to advise on how to handle and prevent this debacle from occurring. Baltimore will be a laughing stock." (The email recipient is redacted.)
In another email, Singleton wrote: "We should be done with half the city before they get around to awarding a bid."
Singleton could not be reached to comment.
When Young's office learned of phone-related purchases by the mayor's technology office through a Verizon representative and contacted Singleton to inquire about the phone system and potential cost savings, Singleton wrote for advice on how to respond.
"I'm not sure why Verizon went running their mouth," Singleton wrote.
A deputy mayor — identified by city officials as Thomaskutty — responded that Singleton should say, in part: "We do not have a pilot project underway and I do not have a cost-saving analysis."
"Those are my thoughts on your response (basically downplay)," he wrote.