Become a digitalPLUS subscriber. 99¢ for 4 weeks.
NewsMaryland

Two experienced attorneys battle for Muhammad's life

Trials and ArbitrationLaws and LegislationDeathHomicideGroucho Marx

VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. - Jonathan Shapiro says he hesitated last November to accept his friend and fellow Virginia defense attorney Peter D. Greenspun's offer to serve as co-counsel for sniper suspect John Allen Muhammad.

Shapiro knew that some people - even a few friends and relatives - would rebuke him for defending a man who, along with an alleged accomplice, is accused of killing at least 13 people across the country last year and plunging the Washington region into three weeks of panic.

Shapiro's 15-year-old daughter, Emma, set him straight, he says, by asking him, "Isn't this your job description, Dad?"

Today, Shapiro and Greenspun will begin the defense portion of Muhammad's death-penalty trial.

In a recent interview at the Virginia Beach courthouse that has been their home of sorts for a month, the two veteran lawyers talked about the frustrations of taking a high-profile case and some challenges they have encountered in defending a man accused of serial murder.

Muhammad faces two counts of capital murder in the death of Dean H. Meyers, 53, at a gas station near Manassas, Va., on Oct. 9, 2002. One count is under Virginia's untested anti-terrorism law. The other alleges he killed more than one person in three years. Prosecutors have presented evidence from several other killings they say are connected to Muhammad, 42, and co-defendant Lee Boyd Malvo, 18.

Both charges carry a possible death sentence, something the defense attorneys - both married fathers of three - say they vigorously oppose.

Shapiro's family vividly remembers the only time one of his clients was put to death. Wilbert Evans, convicted of murder in the killing of an Alexandria sheriff's deputy in 1981, was electrocuted Oct. 17, 1990. His defense attorney of eight years sat in the next room, near a telephone, waiting for a call from the governor that would never come.

"He really feels the responsibility he carries," says his eldest daughter, Meghan, 19 - an aspiring attorney.

She says that if Muhammad is convicted, she won't be surprised if her father cries during the sentencing phase of the case. Greenspun has spearheaded the guilt phase; Shapiro will oversee sentencing if Muhammad is convicted.

The two lawyers say the thought of Muhammad being sentenced to death never leaves their minds.

"There's great responsibility in knowing that the guy at the end of the table, they're trying to kill," Shapiro says. "You can never forget that.

Greenspun adds, "Particularly at 1 and 2 in the morning ... and 3 and 4."

Greenspun, 50, gained public attention when he represented sportscaster Marv Albert in 1997 on sodomy charges. Colleagues have called him one of the best criminal defenders in Virginia.

At 54, Shapiro is known as a dogged lawyer - he refused to give up a case even after a client knocked him out in the courtroom in October 2000.

Shapiro was representing Gregory D. Murphy, who had been charged in the stabbing death of an 8-year-old Alexandria boy. At the end of a routine hearing, Murphy unexpectedly turned on Shapiro and delivered a forceful punch to his jaw.

The lawyer was knocked unconscious and taken to the hospital by ambulance. Although Shapiro wanted to remain Murphy's attorney, a judge later reassigned the case.

Elliott S. Milstein, one of Shapiro's former law professors at American University, says that incident illustrated his commitment to his clients and to the judicial system as a whole.

"He's a warrior for justice," Milstein says of Shapiro, whose solo practice is based in Alexandria. "He's really one of the great ones."

Greenspun, head of a four-lawyer firm in Fairfax, has a similar reputation in the legal community. James M. Hingeley Jr., a public defender in Charlottesville, Va., and past president of the Virginia Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, calls Greenspun "a top-notch criminal trial lawyer."

"He's always thoroughly prepared. He's skillful in trial. He's dedicated to his clients and he gives 100 percent," Hingeley says.

In the Muhammad case, the two experienced attorneys - each has been a lawyer for more than two decades - have found new challenges.

On the first day of trial testimony Muhammad sidelined his lawyers, choosing instead to represent himself.

"We did not see that coming," says Greenspun, adding that he and Shapiro learned of Muhammad's plan an hour before opening statements began Oct. 20. "We had no notice whatsoever."

But, thanks to an abscessed tooth and a little prodding by Judge LeRoy F. Millette Jr., Muhammad turned the legal reins back over to Greenspun and Shapiro two days later. Despite the episode, Shapiro says, "John has always been a cooperative client."

The prosecution's three-week presentation of its case, led by Prince William County Commonwealth's Attorney Paul B. Ebert, was largely a parade of witnesses, medical examiners, victims and victims' relatives, which the defense says also proved challenging.

"We've asked few or no questions of most of the witnesses," Greenspun says. "It just would have been inappropriate to cross-examine many of these people."

In court, Greenspun also has accused prosecutors of turning the courtroom theatrical with some of their exhibits.

"There's no purpose to showing this trunk to the jury, except it's real dramatic and it makes a big splash," he told Judge Millette just before prosecutors had a full-size replica of the rear of Muhammad's dark blue Chevy Caprice wheeled into the tiny courtroom.

Although Greenspun and Shapiro are polished litigators, they have very different courtroom demeanors.

Greenspun greeted most of the commonwealth's witnesses with a curt but cordial "Hi. How are you?" before plowing ahead with questions. Shapiro, who comes across as more subdued, usually introduced himself to the witnesses like this: "I'm Jonathan Shapiro. I have a few questions for you."

Outside the courtroom, the two seem like jokesters and old friends, each taking good-natured jabs at the other - and at themselves.

"It's highly amusing to see your picture in the paper all the time," Shapiro says of the attention the Muhammad case has brought them.

"Particularly the back of my head," the balding Greenspun adds.

"That is amusing," the full-locked Shapiro jokes back.

The two retreat after court recesses each evening to a dull-gray, windowless room that they like to call "the brain trust" of the Muhammad case. Inside, above the mountains of paperwork and stacks of file boxes, they have hung posters of Monty Python and Groucho Marx - the latter both lawyers describe as their hero.

The attorneys say they seek as many reprieves from the gravity of the trial as they can. At times, they say, it can seem as though Muhammad's five-person defense team, which includes Christie Leary, a 28-year-old attorney, and two legal assistants, is up against the world.

Shapiro says he has gotten a few of those "are you out of your mind?" phone calls, and Greenspun says he received four or five nasty e-mails after taking the case. And just recently, someone mailed them a letter - via the courthouse - that called them a few choice names.

But Greenspun's mother, Zelda Greenspun, who lives near Philadelphia and says she is addicted to media accounts of the trial, says she tries to keep her son's case in perspective.

"It is such a horrendous crime," she says, reciting what she tells acquaintances when they question why her son would get involved with it. "But we don't know who did it, and everybody's entitled to a defense.

"Besides, Peter does like a good fight."

Sun staff writer Stephanie Desmon contributed to this article.

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
Trials and ArbitrationLaws and LegislationDeathHomicideGroucho Marx
Comments
Loading