State officials say they believe the figures were inflated by watermen angry about the catch restrictions.
The reported increase in Maryland is "troubling," in the view of one crab scientist.
"They were attempting to reduce harvest," said Eric Johnson, a fisheries ecologist at the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center in Edgewater. "[Even] if the harvest comes in the same as last year, they certainly were not effective."
While acknowledging the higher reports from watermen, Maryland officials have declined to provide any figures, saying state biologists are still reviewing the data. Eric Schwaab, Maryland's deputy natural resources secretary, said other indicators being examined by state biologists suggest that Maryland came close to the two states' joint goal of reducing the catch of female crabs by a third.
"We're very confident that we did substantially reduce the female crab harvest," Schwaab said. But when asked how he could be sure when watermen reported catching more females, he replied, "We can't be."
Fisheries regulators traditionally rely on watermen's harvest reports to help them determine the effectiveness of their efforts to conserve a species.Maryland's reported increase comes as Virginia officials released figures this week showing that their watermen caught about 37 percent fewer females crabs as a result of crabbing restrictions there. Virginia officials said their figures were preliminary.
Prompted by surveys showing the bay's crab population to be seriously depleted and overfished, Maryland's and Virginia's governors pledged last April to take immediate steps to reduce the catch of female crabs by a third.
Such cooperative action was unprecedented. The the two states have differed over how to regulate the most lucrative segment of their seafood industries to protect a shared resource.
The bay's crabs spawn near the Atlantic Ocean in Virginia before fanning out throughout the bay and its rivers to feed, grow and mate. Pregnant females return to Virginia waters in the fall to spawn there in the spring.
The states issued different rules to reach the one-third goal. In Maryland, the state halted the female crab harvest Oct. 23, about seven weeks early, and imposed daily limits on how many females watermen could catch in the two months leading up to the early closure. Virginia halted its female crab harvest Oct. 27, and banned dredging slumbering crabs - most of them females - from the bay bottom in winter.
Watermen sueThe restrictions provoked bitter complaints in both states from watermen, who contended that the scientists were wrong and that the crab stock was rebounding. A group of Virginia watermen sued unsuccessfully to block that state's limits.
Yet some scientists had said last year that they were worried that the states' restrictions didn't go far enough to ensure the desired reduction in female crab catch.
Thomas Miller, one of those who'd expressed doubts, said it's possible that Maryland's decision to close the female harvest season early may have prompted watermen to fish harder than usual up to the cutoff.
"When you put season closures in effect, you often do get unexpected results," said Miller, a fisheries ecologist at the University of Maryland's Chesapeake biological laboratory.
It's also possible, Miller added, that higher harvest reports indicate that the bay's stock of adult crabs had actually increased since a survey last winter found them at dangerously low levels
The harvest "could have gone up for a good reason," he said. Larry Simns, president of the Maryland Watermen's Association, said reports of higher catches last year should come as no surprise.
"I don't think the crab stock was as bad as they portrayed," said Simns, who has questioned the accuracy of the two states' annual winter crab survey, in which scientists dredge slumbering crabs from the bottom at 1,500 sites around the bay. "It shows you there's more crabs around."