Parking garage proposal for park sparks Annapolis fight
Forty years later, city still arguing about cars on City Dock
"This is as big for Annapolis as Harborplace was for Baltimore," said Alderman Ross H. Arnett III, who days ago joined a 6-3 majority voting to let the city pursue plans to wipe most parking spaces off City Dock and move them to the playground site, enabling the city to make better use of what some say is the most valuable piece of real estate in town, if not in Maryland.
Anne Arundel County Board of Education, which co-own the land.
"There's so much emotion around this," said Arnett. "Nobody on the council is happy about the pressure we're under. I've just gotten through writing to one of my constituents who is asking what the process is to recall me."
The city council meeting on April 20 during which the vote was taken went past 3 a.m., as more than 40 people spoke, most to defend the playground at Compromise and Newman streets. About 2,200 people have put their names to an online protest petition posted in January, declaring their dismay at the notion of doing away with a beloved institution.
"We don't want a war with the city," Chris Stelzig, the petition drive organizer, said of the project he feels is not needed and is being rushed along without proper study of the need for parking and whether the site is archaeologically significant.
He said he's not sure whether opponents will pursue legal action, "but if that's the only way we have to stop this wrong-headed idea, we will."
Stelzig and other opponents are not persuaded by the developer's assurances that his proposal replaces much of the park space and includes a new playground across Compromise Street.
"Compromise" is the operative word here, said Andrew D. Bing, who is acting as community liaison for the would-be developer, Compromise LLC. Bing argues that everyone has to give a little to realize the long-discussed and widely accepted goal of doing something else with an area on the north side of City Dock now used as a parking lot.
"This is about something that could transform downtown Annapolis," said Bing.
He was sitting at a blond-wood conference table on a recent afternoon with J. Jeremy Parks, a principal of Compromise, who had just unfurled diagrams of the plan that has sparked the controversy.
Parks, the executive vice president of Jerome J. Parks Cos., said the rough outlines call for a three-story garage with about 300 spaces set behind a building with stores along Compromise Street and two floors of office space above. He figures it would cost about $25 million to build, using no public funds.
It's a relatively modest proposal, yet history suggests formidable obstacles. The argument about getting cars off City Dock has been going on for at least 40 years, and the playground site has always been seen as the best way of achieving that end, said former Mayor Ellen O. Moyer.
She recalled discussions about an underground garage at the site maybe 50 years ago, but that option was always much more expensive, and federal flood and emergency management regulations enacted since then have only raised the tab.
Bing recalled a downtown Annapolis study in the 1980s that included proposals for a garage at the old recreation center site next to the playground on Compromise Street, an underground garage beneath the City Dock traffic circle and a garage at the playground site.
Complications always arose, said Moyer, and nothing got done. Downtown merchants tended to favor the playground site because it was so close to City Dock, but the Board of Education was not enthusiastic, she said.
"The school board has never wanted to be cooperative with the city," said Moyer.
The board has yet to take a position on the most recent proposal, and this time, there's a further complication. Major renovations are scheduled to begin at Annapolis Elementary School this summer, with the school shut down for two years and students attending classes at Annapolis Middle School. Board of Education President Patricia R. Nalley said garage construction would have to take place while the school is closed.
On May 2, the board is scheduled to vote on the same six-page "memorandum of understanding" that was endorsed by the city council in the recent 6-3 vote. The statement is not binding, does not mention Compromise LLC and does not grant permission to build anything, but it is meant to set conditions "that will govern the lease, design, development, construction, operation and management" of the garage/retail/office project.