The Anne Arundel County Council last week adopted new rules for its meetings, including measures to crack down on people who go off-topic when they testify.
The changes were vehemently opposed by a handful of residents who regularly attend meetings and testify on multiple topics.
Karen Delimater, who was removed from a County Council meeting in 2012 for going over the time limit while testifying, said the new rules are a "subterfuge" to citizens' First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and petitioning the government for redress of grievances.
Her brother, Joseph Delimater, objected to a rule requiring speakers to give their name and address before testifying. He said citizens shouldn't be forced to give their name in order to speak at a government meeting.
"This is tyranny. This is something you would see in communist Russia," he said.
Millard Snowden of Glen Burnie said he thinks there should be a check on the County Council chairman's ability to decide whether a speaker's remarks are relevant to the topic at hand.
What if, for example, the chairman has a grudge or political disagreement with the person testifying? In that case, Snowden suggested another council member should be able to object to cutting off a speaker, "if it is legitimate."
Less controversial changes included allowing the recording of meetings as long as it is not a distraction; banning signs and banners in the audience and clarifying that a bill can be withdrawn by its sponsor.
The County Council adopted the new rules, 5-2, without discussion at its Sept. 16 meeting.
NOTE: An earlier version of this story had an incorrect tally for the council vote. It has been corrected here.
twitter.com/pwoodreporterCopyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun