Get unlimited digital access to $0.99 for 4 weeks.
News You Don't Say

Mr. Santorum's misapprehension

Rick Santorum, who appears to have taken this week's lead in the race for the Republican nomination for the presidency, accused President Obama the other day of following a "phony theology," elevating earth above humankind. On Face the Nation yesterday, he clarified those remarks, saying that he had in no way intended to suggest that the president is not a Christian.

Here's a little reminder for Presidents Day.

What Mr. Santorum appears not to understand is how tricky it is in our polity to discuss whether, or what kind of, Christian the president is, or what constitutes his theology. The United States Constitution does not impose a religious test on persons assuming the presidency. If there were such a test, it is highly doubtful that George Washington, nominally Episcopalian but essentially a Stoic and a Deist; John Adams, another Deist; Thomas Jefferson, who denied the divinity of Christ; and Abraham Lincoln, whose religious views were carefully concealed but plainly not standard-brand, would ever have assumed the chief magistracy.

In fact, and it is tiresome to have to repeat this for people who ought to know better, the United States is a secular republic. Its foundational documents, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, make no mention of Jesus, and that is not an accident.The Founders knew from experience of the Church of England what the operation of a state church was like, and they were having none of it.

People who think that because America houses many Christians it ought to be a formally Christian nation have a great deal of history and law to throw over the side to achieve their goal.*

Mr. Obama's theology would become a public issue if he were to attempt to enshrine it in the statutes, an attempt that would have to get past the Congress and the Supreme Court. Should Mr. Santorum assume the presidency and attempt to legislate his theological views, he would face the same checks and balances. And the public.


*Imagine if evangelical Christians were to achieve their long-held goal of returning public prayer to public schools. Now imagine their reaction when those schools, constrained by the constitutional test of not favoring a particular religion, would allow Muslim, Buddhist, or Hindu prayers. Or perhaos allow agnostics and atheists to read select passages from the Meditations of Marcus Aurelius. Some people just don't know when they're well off.

Copyright © 2015, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
  • U.S. founded on bible's teachings

    This letter is in response to atheists who feel that Christians who are opposed to same-sex marriage are forcing their religion on atheists. That is not the case at all. We are seeking to maintain and uphold the Judeo-Christian standards that made America great in the first place. Ask...

  • Dangerous pets

    A discussion of pet peeves on a LinkedIn site for professional copy editors provoked some thought about the whole peculiar pet peeve phenomenon.

  • Joke of the week: "The Hitchhiking Priest"
  • In a word: bumptious

    Each week The Sun's John McIntyre presents a relatively obscure but evocative word with which you may not be familiar, another brick to add to the wall of your vocabulary. This week's word: 

  • Spot the singular "they"

    I sense that not every reader of these dispatches has been persuaded by my arguments that singular they as the solution to English's epicene-pronoun problem is not only reasonable, but increasingly accepted. 

  • The mumpsimus of usage deniers

    The global-warming skeptics on the right will still be denying climate change when there is beachfront property in Wichita, and the anti-vaccination cranks of the left will not be deterred when  carts roll down the street to collect the dead from smallpox. But none are more persistent in...

  • Rules of the game

    Yesterday, as I began a compressed review of grammar with the students in my editing class, I explained that not everything they have been taught as a rule qualifies as such. The Rules are not of a piece, and I went over these categories, which I first described in a post in 2012. 

  • Two lies we tell ourselves about writing

    Ken Wheaton, writing at The Word O’ Wheaton, has some fun with a jeremiad from Leon Wieseltier on the way the wicked Internet has destroyed writing.