Baltimore Mayor Martin O'Malley accused Republican Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. of orchestrating the routine release of bad news about the city's public education system to tarnish the reputation of the schools and hurt O'Malley, a potential Democratic gubernatorial candidate in 2006.
O'Malley's broadside at the governor was prompted by the state Board of Education's decision Tuesday to place 16 city schools on probation for having high rates of violence. The mayor and the governor have been publicly battling over the financially troubled school system since it teetered on bankruptcy this year and O'Malley's local bailout trumped Ehrlich's state [See Schools, 11a] rescue package.
"I anticipate a new event every couple of weeks to make the schools look bad," O'Malley said. "There's obviously people at the state that don't want the city to be successful at anything so long as I'm mayor."
Ehrlich spokesman Henry P. Fawell said the governor's office has nothing to do with the release of information from the office of state schools Superintendent Nancy S. Grasmick.
"It's Grasmick's job to put out the facts," Fawell said. "Citizens of Baltimore need to know the reality of the city school system. It's not Dr. Grasmick's fault or anyone else's fault if the mayor can't accept the facts."
Grasmick denied that her department has a "vendetta" against city schools. She said the probation list was a requirement of the federal No Child Left Behind Act, and she produced copies of letters showing that Baltimore schools chief Bonnie S. Copeland had been warned of the bad news almost a month ago.
"The only tension we have with the city is our fiduciary responsibility and our responsibility to comply with federal law," she said. "Whenever we have to deliver bad news, people think we invent it. It's just not true."
The mayor's rhetoric yesterday seemed to renew last spring's lengthy struggle between Ehrlich and O'Malley over control of the schools.
Although the state and the city have shared a partnership since 1997 -- when Baltimore ceded partial control in exchange for a major infusion of state money -- tension has mounted significantly since the system's financial situation became dire over the past year.
In March, Ehrlich proposed to bail out the schools with a $58 million package that included money from the city and the Abell Foundation but would have given the state more authority in running the system. The mayor responded with a $42 million loan with no state aid that did not cede any additional oversight.
Matthew Crenson, a Johns Hopkins University political science professor who follows state and local politics, said O'Malley's accusations reflected the rivalry between potential gubernatorial opponents.
"This is payback for O'Malley's taking over the schools," Crenson said. "It's in the governor's interest to see that this doesn't work so he can point out that O'Malley has failed."
O'Malley's bailout has seemingly lingered with Ehrlich. In a meeting with the Roland Park Civic League this month, Ehrlich said he was frustrated with O'Malley's intervention, according to an article in the Baltimore Messenger, a neighborhood newspaper published by Patuxent Publishing, which is owned by The Sun.
"The mayor wasted two weeks of my time when he told me to pound sand," Ehrlich is quoted as saying in the Messenger's Aug. 11 issue. "The mayor said they don't need the state. They're going to need the state at some point."
The article also quoted Ehrlich as saying: "Beating up on Baltimore is good politics in some places in the state."
Fawell said the governor was referring to tactics used by other elected officials in the state who could blame the state's bailout of Baltimore's schools on why money would not be available for their constituents' needs.
"It could be good politics for someone who wanted to do that, but it's not something that [the governor] does," Fawell said in explaining the quote.