In Case You Missed It: Baltimore Running Festival photos
News

State vies to be FAA drone test site

Military EquipmentLaws and LegislationAir Transportation IndustryFederal Aviation AdministrationArmed Forces

Despite concerns about privacy and public safety, Maryland is seeking to open its skies to commercial drones under a federal program that could make the state a powerhouse in the burgeoning unmanned aircraft industry.

Maryland is among 24 states vying to be one of six sites the Federal Aviation Administration will use to test how to integrate the remotely piloted aircraft into U.S. airspace. With thousands of jobs at stake, the competition has been fierce and expensive.

While Congress has debated the use of covert military drone strikes in the Middle East, the proliferation of unarmed drones in U.S. airspace has received less attention. The FAA has issued more than 1,400 permits for drones since 2007, mainly to police departments and civilian federal agencies.

The agency estimates that the number of small commercial drones will grow to 7,500 within five years.

In addition to law enforcement, unmanned aircraft are already being used in other countries to dust crops and monitor oil spills. Florida officials are testing a drone that can spot mosquito larvae in hard-to-reach mangrove trees. China is experimenting with drones that can deliver packages — just as the U.S. military has used such aircraft to deliver cargo to troops in Afghanistan. Real estate agents want to use them for aerial photographs of properties.

Commercial drones are coming, said Matt Scassero, a retired Navy captain and pilot who is leading the effort to make Maryland one of the test sites. The only question, he said, is how well the state will be positioned to benefit.

"The bottom line ... is jobs," said Scassero, head of the unmanned aerial systems test site at the University of Maryland's A. James Clark School of Engineering, which has taken the lead on the state's proposal. "Maryland stands to gain a lot."

The FAA prohibits drones for most commercial activity and issues permits on a case-by-case basis for law enforcement, firefighting, border patrol and other government functions. The test sites will help the agency change its airspace rules to accommodate the growing demand for unmanned aircraft owned by businesses.

The main trade association of drone manufacturers, the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International, estimates that the industry will have an $82 billion impact on the U.S. economy by 2025. More than $2 billion of that would come in Maryland — regardless of whether it is selected as an FAA test site — in new jobs, tax revenue and other spending, according to the association.

Supporters envision a world vastly aided by unmanned systems, where firefighters can search burning buildings with less risk, farmers can scan fields for early signs of insect damage — limiting the need for pre-emptive insecticide use — and scientists can analyze hurricanes and other dangerous weather from afar.

But privacy advocates have raised concerns about the expanded use of drones, which unlike a noisy helicopter can stealthily carry a camera up to a window, for instance. State lawmakers and local officials across the country are proposing limits, including Del. Ron George, an Anne Arundel County Republican running for governor.

George's legislation would require police to obtain a warrant before using a drone. The proposal stalled in committee during this year's General Assembly session.

Mason Clutter with the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers says the FAA should have outlined more specific privacy requirements for the test sites. Her group and others want clear rules in place now, before drones become more commonplace.

"Test site or not, the average citizen wants to know the drone flying above them is not spying on them," she said.

Others are worried about the safety of pilotless airplanes overhead. Those concerns were stoked when a 44-foot Navy drone crashed last year on the Eastern Shore across the Chesapeake Bay from the Patuxent River Naval Air Station. No one was injured.

Addressing those concerns, supporters say, is part of the reason why the FAA is creating the test sites.

Commercial drones are generally prohibited in national airspace, but the FAA issues permits for some limited uses. Meanwhile, the agency is making it easier for public entities, such as police, to fly them. The FAA announced in 2012 that law enforcement agencies can fly drones up to 25 pounds, but those aircraft are prohibited over assemblies of people and heavily trafficked roads.

Current drone use can potentially take place up to 50,000 feet for the most sophisticated aircraft. Model airplanes, by contrast, are limited to 400 feet and can be flown only by hobbyists.

To address the expected increase of unmanned flight, Congress last year required the Obama administration to develop rules to integrate drones into U.S. airspace. Lawmakers mandated that the FAA set up the six test sites.

The agency is set to announce the sites in December.

"We're confident that the data we will get from the test sites, once they're up and running, will go a long way toward helping us develop what safe integration will look like," said FAA spokesman Les Dorr.

The agency began accepting proposals in February, setting off a stiff competition among 25 groups in two dozen states. Although no federal money will be awarded to the winners, supporters believe drone manufacturers and researchers will flock to the sites, driving economic development.

The Maryland Department of Business and Economic Development awarded a $500,000 grant to the University of Maryland to submit the application. Other states are investing even more, including Florida, where officials spent $1.4 million on their bid.

The applications are not available to the public, but Scassero said Maryland is able to make a strong case for one of the sites.

To begin with, the University of Maryland is already engaged in developing the vehicles, working closely with the Navy and NASA. The military is already testing drones at Naval Air Station Patuxent River in St. Mary's County. And the region's diverse marine environment — namely, the Chesapeake Bay — is also a plus for those researching how the aircraft will function in different geographic settings, he said.

Finally, the state's proximity to Washington and its abundance of military installations means that much of its airspace is already restricted. That would give the test drones more room to fly without interfering with commercial airliners, private pilots and other aircraft.

Scassero, a Naval Academy graduate, said the unmanned vehicles could potentially fly out of the Patuxent naval station, but also Crisfield Municipal Airport on the Eastern Shore and St. Mary's County Regional Airport, both of which signed on to the state's bid.

Rep. Andy Harris, a Republican who represents the Eastern Shore, is a member of the Congressional Unmanned Systems Caucus. He signed a letter in May, along with the rest of state's delegation, supporting Maryland as a site for the testing.

Other states, including North Dakota and Alaska, have touted their less-congested airspace. California is pitching its geographic diversity, including mountains, ocean and desert. Many states, including Maryland, made their case for a test site while at a Washington conference in August that brought together some of the nation's largest drone manufacturers.

Some of those companies already have a presence in Maryland. One, Lexington Park-based Ausley Associates, has been working with the military on unmanned systems for more than 15 years. Tony Pucciarella, the company's unmanned aircraft systems program manager, said the opportunities for commercial drones are vast.

"What's happening right now is akin to the jet age back in the '50s and '60s. Some people even equate it to the beginning of aviation," he said. "For Maryland to be a part of that huge wave — it's a game changer."

Former Baltimore Police Commissioner Frederick H. Bealefeld III said the department looked into unmanned aircraft before he left last year, but at the time the technology and regulations weren't advanced enough to use them in place of helicopters.

The benefits are obvious, he said: Drones would be less expensive than helicopters. They would require less maintenance, could fly longer without risking pilot fatigue and would allow police to surveil without the loud thwacking of rotors.

Bealefeld, now a criminal justice professor at Stevenson University, said he nevertheless expects police helicopter units will play a role even if drones become more pervasive. It will likely be a while before drones can carry aloft the heavy spotlight and public address systems that make police helicopters effective in many situations, he said.

Bealefeld also acknowledged that law enforcement will have to wrestle with privacy concerns. But he said Baltimore's experience with closed-circuit cameras over the past decade underscores for him that it's not a given people will reject having cameras in the neighborhood — or even in the air.

"People not only embraced the cameras, they wanted more," he said.

john.fritze@baltsun.com

twitter.com/jfritze

matthew.brown@baltsun.com

twitter.com/matthewhaybrown

Non-military drones

•The FAA has issued more than 1,400 permits for drones since 2007, mainly to police and federal agencies.

•Most current non-military drones are small, weighing less than 50 pounds.

•The government expects 7,500 small commercial drones in the air within five years.

•Drones are generally prohibited in national airspace, but the FAA issues permits for some limited uses.

Source: FAA

Copyright © 2014, The Baltimore Sun
Related Content
Military EquipmentLaws and LegislationAir Transportation IndustryFederal Aviation AdministrationArmed Forces
Comments
Loading