We think of war and we think of airplanes.
But when Orville and Wilbur Wright invented the airplane a century ago,they did not envision massive aerial bombardments of "shock and awe."
In fact, the Ohio brothers once thought their invention would become thegreat deterrent to warfare.
It was an idea shared by many after the inception of flight. War wouldbecome practically impossible, the brothers thought, because the scouting doneby aircraft would equalize opposing nations with information on each other'smovements, preventing surprise attacks.
"We thought governments would recognize the impossibility of winning bysurprise attacks," Orville said in 1917, "and that no country would enter intowar with another of equal size when it knew that it would have to win bysimply wearing out its enemy."
Two years before, he had declared: "The aeroplane will prevent war bymaking it too expensive, too slow, too difficult, too long drawn out."
Yet eight years after the bicycle mechanics first flew across the sands atKitty Hawk, N.C., the airplane was used to make war deadlier.
In 1911, an Italian pilot on an observation mission reached over the sideof his airplane and dropped four grenades on Turkish targets during theItalo-Turkish war. Assault by air had become a reality.
Shortly before his death in 1948 and three years after American B-29Superfortresses dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima andNagasaki, Orville Wright was asked by interviewer Leland D. Case if he and hisbrother ever thought their invention would be used for bombing.
The smile under Orville's gray mustache disappeared.
"Yes, we thought it might have military use - but in reverse," said the76-year-old inventor, whose brother had died at age 45 in 1912. "Because themen who start wars aren't the ones who do the fighting, we hoped that thepossibility of dropping bombs on capital cities would deter them."
Case noted that that same idealism persuaded dynamite inventor Alfred Nobelthat his explosive creation would make war so catastrophic that men would turnaway from it.
"The day when two army corps will be able to destroy each other in asecond, all civilized nations will recoil in horror and disband their armies,"Nobel said.
"We talked and we thought that way too," Orville said. "We dared to hope wehad invented something that would bring lasting peace to the earth. But wewere wrong. We underestimated man's capacity to hate and to corrupt good meansfor an evil end."
Little could he have imagined the deadly technology that would turnaircraft into the chief instruments of war. The aerodynamic principlespioneered by the engineering duo not only redefined the boundaries of thetraditional battlefield, but gave birth to planes responsible for some ofhistory's most horrific acts of carnage.
"Technology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neutral," said historianMelvin C. Kranzberg, and the Wrights always recognized their technology was adouble-edged sword.
"The Wrights were well aware that flying machines would likely dropexplosives on their journey to the millennium, and they were not pacifistsenough to let that prospect keep them from selling the machine to soldiers,"James Tobin points out in To Conquer the Air: The Wright Brothers and theGreat Race for Flight.
Still, the first client for their would-be instrument for peace was noneother than the U.S. Army. Under contract in 1909, the Wrights built thetwo-seat, 735-pound Wright Military Flyer, the world's first militaryairplane. It was designated Signal Corps Airplane No. 1 and cost the Army$30,000.
Wright brothers historian Tom D. Crouch says the military sales were drivenby the fact that, in the beginning, there was a limited market for airplanes.
"The Wright brothers were geniuses in business terms as well as engineeringterms and they saw there was no market for this thing," said Crouch, seniorcurator of aeronautics at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. "Theyrecognized at the outset that sales to governments were going to be theirprimary market because the military had things you could do with it."
Reconnaissance missions were one, and in 1915, Orville said such missionsexplained why fighting had dragged on in Europe during World War I.
"Each side has such complete knowledge of the other's movements that bothare obliged to crawl into trenches and fight by means of slow, tedious routinerather than by quick, spectacular dashes," he told Collier's Weekly. "War willbecome prohibitively expensive. And the scouting work in flying machines willbe the predominating factor in bringing this about. I like to think soanyhow."
But in the end, Orville adopted a far more pragmatic view of the airplane'simpact.
"He would say something like the invention of the airplane was sort of likethe invention of fire," says Crouch. "Fire has done enormous damage to humancivilization over the centuries, but when you add everything up, it's still agood thing that we had fire."
Information about centennial activities can be found at www.countdowntokittyhawk-.com, www.wrightexperience- .com. and www.centennialof-flight.com.